Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - samesamebutdifferent

Pages: 1 ... 243 244 [245] 246 247 ... 278
Shipping / Re: Question regarding delivery method
« on: January 14, 2013, 10:42 am »
Seems like you have answered your own question by discovering it wasn't possible kind of making this thread irrelevant  ::)

How's this for a concept.

One quick and easy solution from a vendor-side POV would be the fast implementation of a basic standard, that they can easily add to their listings which would make it super easy for buyers to sort out the good from the bad.

So, I would like to introduce the SOMS Standard!

Small Order Minimum Stealth Standard

Very simply rules to comply.

1. This is for orders under 10g of powders.
2. Method of freight is regular mail
3. Letter has the appearance inside and out of a regular business or personal letter
4. Product cannot be detected through the envelope, visually or by feel.
5. Product is undetectable by dogs for the reasonably foreseeable duration of the delivery.

If vendors want to comply to this standard, they simply state "SOMS Compliant" on their listings.  Then buyers can very, very easily see the vendors that have an active interest in improving their shipping.

What do you think????

Sounds good, I'd just like to see vendors implement the 3M bags for a start, have been pushing it pretty hard but so far only a couple of vendors have shown any interest and that's because they are already using them.

Generally no but in some circumstances delays happen, give SR support a chance to respond before claiming the system 'stole' your coins, that's more than a little innaccurate but I can appreciate how stressful it must be to have something like that happen. You will get mixed responses on here that will probably just stress you out even more, best to wait until you have had contact with support.

Hope it works out ok.


what is there to discuss?

did anyone get scammed?

Rumor mill / Re: New Australian Vendor
« on: January 13, 2013, 08:00 pm »
Welcome to the road mate, great to see more Aussie vendors coming on  :)

Looks good, just bookmarked, thanks Wads. ;)

No worries jnemonic.  :)

Where the fuck do you keep finding these avatars Wadozo!?!

There are many places to find them SSBD. Most will need to be re-sized to approx 50 x 50 pixels and the resolution increased to a minimum of 200,000 pixels/m, using software such as Gimp (easiest and it's free) as they are for the most part originally 100 x 100 pixels. That creates a file size too big to be used on the forum, hence the need to re-size most of them. With animated GIF's, you in fact need to re-size each layer to ensure the GIF retains it's animation. Just resizing the 1st layer will leave you with a usable GIF but without the animation.  :( I can make you one if you like. Just tell me something that represents a look you like and I'll see what I can find. Up to you.  :)

Will PM you mate :)

Product offers / Re: Got A LOT of opiates 15mg, 30mg, 40 mg
« on: January 13, 2013, 07:47 pm »
Please ensure you have a vendor account before doing and deals, you have stated you will be doing this though so seems all good.

Any established forum members have any feedback to add to this thread?

Low hanging fruit more like it.

Posting ANY identifiable information no matter how insignificant you may think it might be is highly ill-advised but I think you have gotten that message loud and clear based upon what others have already posted.

Hope it works out for you.


Haven't noticed any posts yet, more of the same??

Shipping / Re: Packaging methods tested with actual trained dog
« on: January 13, 2013, 11:26 am »
1500x less permeable than vac seal!! c'mon vendors lets get this shit happening!!

Rumor mill / Re: La Fuente - New Cocaine and Commercial Weed Vendor!!
« on: January 13, 2013, 11:07 am »
I reported him on the main site for deception in his listing stating he was shipping from AU when in fact it was coming from Mexico, interesting he can't even get the shipments out of his own country, sounds very similar to what Kolbitz claimed re a recent slew of alleged intercepts from Colombia too.

If it sounds too good to be true then it is.

To be fair to Kolbitz, he's at least been up front about everything and is trying to make it right.

Absolutely, Kolbitz has been up front in explaining and has stated is sending reships, my comments were directed at La Fuente which was blatant deception on the main site, shame these South American vendors are having so many issues getting shipments out of their own countries though, hope Kolbitz has better success in future.

Looks good, just bookmarked, thanks Wads. ;)

No worries jnemonic.  :)

Where the fuck do you keep finding these avatars Wadozo!?!

Things are not going to change unless SR admins force new rules upon vendors.

Buyers can choose to only use vendors with quality packaging and change the market themselves.

I wish it was only that simple, I have only found a very small number of vendors selling HQ of my preferred drug of choice on SR so chopping and changing vendors isn't really an option, as several people have already said it is a numbers game so all the time 'most' shipments get through there is no real incentive for vendors to implement safer packaging. What is being proposed on this thread would add negligible cost if any to existing packaging arrangements but WOULD greatly reduce the chances of canine detection, seems a no brainer to me but change won't just happen unless people ask for it. As previously stated I would even be happy to pay a premium for this shipping option even though the real cost to the vendor wouldn't be much if anything, I just want to incentivise this option to vendors so more use it.

In reality it should be the standard but we are a long way off from that, baby steps I guess.

Pages: 1 ... 243 244 [245] 246 247 ... 278