99herps: Yes, you completely have misread my post. My money laundering consultation, cash-out consultation and cash in the mail are 3 seperate services, they are not together at all.And yes actually, I can provide a fully auditable path for vendors, there are many here, hell go read the damn article on me, the journalist known the identities of some of my clients who agreed to message him to confirm they worked with me, some of SR's top guys who are far more paranoid than you are on the subject."Many grillings without issue but no audit is flawlessly passed? I'm not following this. Maybe I'm missing something. It strikes me as odd that so many of your clients are singled out for criminal/tax audits. I'm finding you a bit hard to follow in the second paragraph but you seem to be saying that you cash out bitcoins by sending clients cash in the mail. "When you are audited, they look for things such as tax over/underpayments, some things wrongly classified as expense or missed out etc, if you've ever owned a legitimate business, which you clearly haven't, you would realise this. Also, anyone who earns a large amount of money is subject to more audits, this is very obvious and shouldn't need explanation.Also, my plans are to the individual because every country has different laws, record keeping requirements, tax rates and paperwork to fill out, no one model can fit every purpose. Every plan I give away is another model I can't use so yes I do stand to lose out by dislcosing that actually, it's a hint for investigators to follow and even getting a whiff of an idea and they will almost definitely investigate it.Please re-read my post history, realise I am not some cheap knockoff with others can vouch for and with enough clients that I actually have to reject most of them these days, and nobody coming here crying I have ripped them off or whatever or they've landed in trouble, do you think it is really that possible that I am a fraud or doing it wrong? Your skepticism is well placed, somebody like me and my services need to be questioned because laundering for big vendors is a serious issue, but in order to do so constructively and meaningfully you must first not misinterpret my words and secondly understand business - neither of which you have done in that post.