Silk Road forums

Discussion => Silk Road discussion => Topic started by: StExo on December 16, 2012, 01:27 am

Title: <removed>
Post by: StExo on December 16, 2012, 01:27 am

<removed>

Title: Re: Vendor Backup Database
Post by: SelfSovereignty on December 16, 2012, 01:33 am

Brilliant, mate.  I think I'll have a wee peek... thanks for the time.

Title: Re: Vendor Backup Database
Post by: Nightcrawler on December 16, 2012, 01:46 am

Signature fails to verify, as follows:

gpg --verify [filename]
gpg: armor header: Hash: SHA1
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)
gpg: original file name=''
gpg: Signature made Sat 15 Dec 2012 08:26:09 PM EST using RSA key ID 1631755A
gpg: BAD signature from "StExo <stexo@tormail.org>"
gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA1

NC

Title: <removed>
Post by: StExo on December 16, 2012, 02:28 am

<removed>

Title: Re: Vendor Backup Database
Post by: Nightcrawler on December 16, 2012, 07:38 am

Quote from: StExo on December 16, 2012, 02:28 am

Quote from: Nightcrawler on December 16, 2012, 01:46 am

Signature fails to verify, as follows:

gpg --verify [filename]
gpg: armor header: Hash: SHA1
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)
gpg: original file name=''
gpg: Signature made Sat 15 Dec 2012 08:26:09 PM EST using RSA key ID 1631755A
gpg: BAD signature from "StExo <stexo@tormail.org>"
gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA1

NC

Apologies, that's been fixed now.

gpg --verify [filename]
gpg: armor header: Hash: SHA1
gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32)
gpg: original file name=''
gpg: Signature made Sat 15 Dec 2012 09:23:14 PM EST using RSA key ID 1631755A
gpg: Good signature from "StExo <stexo@tormail.org>"
gpg: WARNING: Using untrusted key!
gpg: textmode signature, digest algorithm SHA1

Verified as correct, now. Thank you.

NC