Quote from: mrguymann on August 03, 2013, 12:23 amQuote from: slirp on August 02, 2013, 07:36 pmare there different isomers of meth that explains differences?Yes the L isomer is pretty much worthless. You can buy it OTC at most any drug store in vic's inhalers. l-desoxyephedrine- different chemical name for the same compound. L looks and acts near identical to the D isomer but lacks all of the desired effects. Even seems like it diminishes your high i, in quality and duration- but thats just my observation- It's difficult to separate from the L from D, costly for chems to fix, and for that reason profit minded chems wont even test their ratios , since most of today's users arent aware of it ,or know how to detect it.Nobody tests their ratios, as far as I know. I've sure as Hell never heard of this anyway, it's hard and it takes very expensive equipment to do properly: it's known what a given reaction should produce, so as long as it didn't get all fucked up because you used claritin instead of pseudoephedrine or something and it's producing the right drug, why bother to test the ratios? That's just probability, and there's fucking millions or billions of molecules (read: probability outcomes) in a tested sample. You can be pretty damn sure that the D-to-L ratio has creeped as close to the "average" as it's ever gonna get, I should think. If you know the average already... well, why waste time and money.Also, there are those who disagree with your assessment of racemic meth. In fact there are those who think the absolute best meth is actually racemic (50/50). Personally I don't have a fuckin' clue, I find it an interesting theory and would absolutely *love* to test it. The only expensive equipment I have for testing molecules though is in my big ol' skull here, and it tends to give... iffy results, know what I mean.P.S. - I love you too, Mr. Honey Badger :P