You guys are seriously disappointing me here. No one has said anything -- nothing, not one damn thing -- that reasonably explains the possibility that more than a single group of researchers came to almost identical conclusions.Now listen, I don't really think this list is properly organized either -- but my God, if you seriously think anecdotal evidence of "oh, but I've never seen anybody hurt more by this than that...", or just flat out stating "it's bullshit, this is worse than that and they've got it all wrong," without providing data to support your claims trumps researchers with a paper to back them up... well then I just don't fucking know what to say.The human race spent many, many, MANY years trusting intuition and not requiring indisputable facts before accepting a conclusion. We got witches burned at the stake. Entire generations wiped out by holy wars. Iran and Saudi Arabia as they still are today -- publicly beheading people we'd call "totally innocent" here.That's why I'm arguing in support of the paper -- not because of this list, but because it's one of the worst mistakes you can make to dismiss scientific evidence out of hand. At least read the fucking thing before you decide it's bullshit. Personally I don't care enough to bother, but I'm not arguing with it.