Quote from: bingcrosby on November 12, 2012, 09:57 pmFor the conspiracy theorists or those who don't have a copy of DPRs public key offline, here is another message that you can independently verify his recently posted key against.Obviously I could have just made this and I am the cops with DPRs compromised private key. And I'm also retrospectively editing the original posts that you can also search for on here that have also all been signed with DPRs key. Anyway, I have another one of these offline that was generated when silkroad changed to the new URL if anyone wants yet another way to validate his newest messages are not fraudulent.My apologies if I'm coming off as irrational (or if you weren't at all referring to me). I'm not disputing that whoever made the posts has DPR's private key. I'm not even trying to say it isn't DPR who made them today. Not trying to stir up trouble either; please don't interpret it that way.I just don't understand why he'd use an email address at a domain that wasn't registered until a year and a half after SR was started? Why not just leave it blank if you didn't intend on putting a usable one in, instead of using one that appears legitimate enough to get some people emailing it? Is the whois database info not entirely accurate? Would it show as newly created if somebody accidentally let it lapse and then re-registered it fresh, maybe?I'm trying to learn, not point fingers.