Providing access to drugs has its basis in freedom of choice, right? Don't we all subscribe to the belief that it's immoral, unethical, and outright unacceptable to restrict someone's freedom so long as they don't interfere with anyone else also making their own choices? So long as it doesn't hinder another's self sovereignty, I sincerely believe a person should be able to do anything. And I do mean fucking anything.Cyanide, as far as I know, is an extremely fast, almost painless way to cause death. Suicide is a difficult thing to accomplish, believe it or not. Even disregarding a healthy person's right to choose to die, what about terminally ill patients living in places where assisted suicide isn't an option? I'm willing to bet it's both hard and terribly unpleasant to try overdosing on morphine or the like when you're already vomiting your guts up from terminal cancer, etc. There are perfectly reasonable uses for cyanide even as a poison. Sure it can be misused. So can guns. So can a butter knife, for Christ's sake. It's up to individuals not to misuse it. Same as any drug.Now if somebody tried to sell weapons grade enriched uranium, even I don't think we (the general public) should have access to that... but short of weapons of mass destruction, the more choices the better, I say.