Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - scout

Pages: 1 ... 84 85 [86] 87 88 ... 250
1276
Silk Road discussion / MOVED: Godddammmm MONGORIANS!!!!
« on: April 29, 2013, 05:39 am »
This topic has been moved to Off topic (http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?board=1.0).

http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=153102.0

1277
Off topic / Re: Godddammmm MONGORIANS!!!!
« on: April 29, 2013, 05:39 am »
hahahahaha.  CCCSHIIITTYYY CHICKEN?

1278
Bug reports / Re: Auto-Finalize Not Working :O
« on: April 29, 2013, 05:29 am »
Smokeables is correct: DPR disabled autofinalize when we first started having issues with the DDoS attacks.

1279
This topic has been moved to Product offers (http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?board=5.0).

http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=152430.0

1280
Silk Road discussion / Re: under attack again
« on: April 28, 2013, 11:03 pm »
That's totally fine, but I don't want to see a bunch of people putting themselves in danger - particularly since most don't seem to understand the importance of browsing directly through Tor (rather than the .to proxy).  It's good that you already have a secure setup - just want to make sure to encourage others to do the same, that's all.

1281
Silk Road discussion / Re: under attack again
« on: April 28, 2013, 10:54 pm »
http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=77808
http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=151488

Those are just two of the many, many threads discussing this.  He is free to access SR how he wants, and Liberte is definitely a great set up, but why leave the .to in there when it's just as easy to remove it and not have to worry about what info is or is not available to the .to site owner?  It's easier and simpler to remove it and not take the chance.  I'm not just saying that for his benefit - because obviously if he's running Liberte, things are pretty secure, but I'm saying that because most people browsing with the .to in the url are NOT running Liberte or anything else for that matter -- most are simply browsing from the clearnet using the .to proxy to access onion sites.  And for THOSE people, yes, it is dangerous.

EDIT:

In fact, the .to proxy site itself warns users:

Quote
By using this service instead of connecting directly to the Tor network you are trading off security and anonymity for convenience. Know that we can identify the IP of visitors using this service (but chooses not to). We strongly recommended to access Tor Hidden Services directly using the Tor Browser Bundle to increase your security and anonymity.

1282
What a tool.  Vendors like you give SR a bad name.  :(

Agreed.

1283
Silk Road discussion / Re: under attack again
« on: April 28, 2013, 10:43 pm »
that .to automatically puts it up there. im running epiphany browser on liberte linux so all my network connections are torified.

check out liberte linux:)

Scout got schooled!

How did I get schooled?  Have you not seen the influx of new users in the past 1-2 weeks which have been using .to urls to browse, post, buy, and vend here without understanding the risk of using the .to extension? 

.to is a proxy for accessing Tor sites from the clearweb or non-Tor browsers.  Whoever runs the .to proxy can access your traffic.

1284
I think you've outdone yourself here. You began this thread hoping for some sympathy and you end up blaming everyone here but yourself. Time to throw in the towel kid, it's time to go home. No friends for you here.

I would be skeptical of any new vendors selling addy for the next while. Might be a ploy for revenge.

Good advice. I already got my new account set up with two sales. See all you gay boys later!

Which is fine, and allowed, when a vendor is banned.  They are free to start a new account and will be allowed to vend as long as they don't do the same shit that got them banned initially.  (and, of course, as long as they don't scam people.)  So, no surprise there.  Might last longer this time around if you develop some professionalism.

1285
This topic has been moved to Rumor mill (http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?board=7.0).

http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=153033.0

1286
You were banned because someone reported that you scammed them ... multiple people, actually.  Anyway, I believe that's why you were banned.

I don't know the details of what has happened in this instance but what right of reply is given to the vendor. Regardless of who the vendor is or what they have done they should all get a chance to defend themselves

They absolutely do get that opportunity.  In some cases, the decision is then overturned.  However, in this case, it was not a single report that caused the banning.  It was several reports from different users.  SR Admin always investigate and unless they have actual proof, then they aren't going to ban the vendor - they'll just keep an eye on the situation.  In cases where it is obvious and blatant and proof has been provided / found, then they ban them outright.  Still, he had the opportunity to plead his case and provide proof to support his claims.  If he provided any proof of his own, which I don't think he has.

Quit your bullshit! its been 48 hours and my message was read and ignored.

Then you must not have presented proof of your claims, which isn't surprising since you haven't presented any proof here either.

1287
I'll do it as soon as the site goes up, and I hope it doesn't happen again :(

As long as you set a strong passphrase and a strong PIN, and then never provide that PIN anywhere other than your account page on SR, then it won't happen again.

1288
Silk Road discussion / Re: under attack again
« on: April 28, 2013, 10:26 pm »
Take them out then - you shouldn't be browsing SR or the forums with the .to in the url.

1289
You were banned because someone reported that you scammed them ... multiple people, actually.  Anyway, I believe that's why you were banned.

I don't know the details of what has happened in this instance but what right of reply is given to the vendor. Regardless of who the vendor is or what they have done they should all get a chance to defend themselves

They absolutely do get that opportunity.  In some cases, the decision is then overturned.  However, in this case, it was not a single report that caused the banning.  It was several reports from different users.  SR Admin always investigate and unless they have actual proof, then they aren't going to ban the vendor - they'll just keep an eye on the situation.  In cases where it is obvious and blatant and proof has been provided / found, then they ban them outright.  Still, he had the opportunity to plead his case and provide proof to support his claims.  If he provided any proof of his own, which I don't think he has.

1290
Silk Road discussion / Re: under attack again
« on: April 28, 2013, 10:20 pm »
is that whats causing me to get these messages?


onion.to

A connection to silkroadvb5piz3r.onion could not be established. General failure.

or this one:


onion.to

silkroadvb5piz3r.onion is currently unavailable. Proxy timed out while trying to connect. (4).


any info would be awesome!

much love_ mcrad!

For one thing, you shouldn't be using the .to url to access the site ..... that is the clearweb-accessible url.  You should be using the Tor Browser Bundle and NEVER using a .to link/url!

Correct url:

silkroadvb5piz3r.onion   <--- not onion.to

Remove the .to!

Pages: 1 ... 84 85 [86] 87 88 ... 250