826
Shipping / Re: Are P.O. Boxes more risky than a home address?
« on: August 15, 2013, 09:58 pm »So in answering my question, "Are PO Boxes more risk than a home address?"
You're pretty much saying that one is neither more risky than the other. Simply walking into a PO to retrieve my mail adds no more risk than walking out to the end of your driveway and getting it out of your mailbox?
An addy is an addy.
I assume if I was under that much surveillance that they would find some way to get me, if they really wanted to. Regardless of where I picked up my mail.
This is the point that I try to get across to my friend, that I am not putting myself at any more risk simply because there is a camera watching my mailbox. I highly doubt the cameras in my post office even work anymore.
Thank you for your replies.
In all honesty I could not say if a PO box is more risky than ordering to your home, in the eyes of the law they would probably be viewed precisely the same. My unqualified subjective assumption though would be a PO box is more risky given the chances of someone inadvertently sending you drugs in the mail would be exponentially less to a PO box than your home address if you were put into a situation where you had to deny all knowledge. When you combine that with the CCTV issue not being a factor at home if you really had to go that route then I'd use the home address over a PO box registered in your real credentials.
But again, both those options are fr from desirable, get an anonymous drop arrangement.