Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RxKing

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 67
91
Did you report them on SR? I agree with you that it totally looks like a scam..  I reported it to Vendor support.

I hope it is not true...but so far 100% of the time these scumbags are scamming.

Good looking out

92
Silk Road discussion / Re: Security warning and advisory
« on: August 12, 2013, 12:23 pm »
Your not green....your stupid..and there is a difference.

Good thing being stupid and asking stupid questions is allowed in these forums. You will fit in perfect. I would suggest you join the PGP club. You are exactly what they are looking for. Thank you for the advice. I will try. Good thing you told me...without your sharp insight, I may never have figured it out. Keep up the smart questions, you are clearly an asset to the community. As you seem to see stuff the rest of us missed. I do not think anyone has ever though if LE could take over a vendor account and sell drugs to entrap people... as you suggested. Good thing you got passed the 50 thread count so you can post in these forums. I just wish you would have come a couple years ago to help us all out. Oh well...at least you are here now. Please think of some more brilliant ideas and start threads. We need to hear what you think.

93
Silk Road discussion / Re: Security warning and advisory
« on: August 12, 2013, 11:37 am »
you need to step up your sarcasm game, ace

notwithstanding your brilliance, and my naivety, i'll take that as a yes

thanks, champ :)

That wasn't sarcasm. ;D

94
Silk Road discussion / Re: Security warning and advisory
« on: August 12, 2013, 11:26 am »
is it at all possible that this exploit has enabled LE to seize control of established vendor accounts and utilize them to entrap buyers?

OMG...NOOOOOOOO!!

How did you even think up the idea that this could be possible??? 

95
Silk Road discussion / Re: feedback system overhaul
« on: August 12, 2013, 10:04 am »
The buyers should see nothing bit the feedback left...BUT internally...the feedback from a high priced order, from a buyer that has big stats..should be weighted a lot more then a buyer with zero stats on a $1 item.

Also an item that was free or near free...should not even be counted or seen. As a potential buyer can't tell if the feedback is from a $0 item....or from someone that ordered $15k  in items.

Also if buyers just stayed in escrow...they would eliminate a lot of headaches.
That's a bit silly, why would you want $0 listings to not be seen whatsoever? How would new vendors listing sample items for the soul purpose of receiving feedback... Show that they've had items sent and received?

Because a sample doesn't mean shit. A sample is not paid for...and anyone can send out samples for reviews. And anyone that receives free drugs is not someone that is going to give  honest feedback. And even if the feedback was honest...it was for a sample....

So yes I agree that it might prove the buyer has SOME real drugs...and that he can send them in the mail...it proves NOTHING else. And it is an EASY WAY for the vendor to establish feedback and then scam buyers. How you can not see this is what is disturbing. As a buyer...I would never want to base me choosing them on free listings for samples!! And I would hope everyone feels the same!!


And staying in escrow isn't always the best option, say in the case of a new buyer with an established vendor. The main problem it seems you're getting at with this is more so that buyers aren't returning to update feedback if they FE. But I'd hazard a guess that most customers that FE, and then fail to receive anything or believe they've been scammed will generally come back and change their rating\feedback. If some of the other suggestions go through it seems these bad ratings would be more easily viewable, and hopefully at least improve this issue.

I never said it was the best option. I just said that if they did...they would eliminate a lot of headaches! And once again...what I said is 100% true.

I am all for someone who wants to FE. That is their choice. They know the risk. And I love it is an option. As I know some vendors need it. I do not use it. And I never will. I actually do not like when buyers FE...as it messes up my system. But this is not about me..it is about helping to protect the buyer form getting scammed. Something I HATE. And NOT FEing...would help them. And not counting feedback from a $0 item would help them. There are other ways that a new vendor can sell his wares. FREE SAMPLES are a really shitty way to go about vending...and the feedback or forum reviews from such transactions....are ...WORTHLESS!!!!


96
(and more are to come as BlueGiraffe motherfucker leaked ALL customer addresses from ALL deals he ever done to the police.)

The OP is clearly an idiot. I think even Astor would agree.

But the fact he say's the sentence I quoted above...just shows how nutty he is. This is simply a total false statement...and a lie. And this is the EXACT kind of bullshit that is spread in these forums that ruins all the credibility of the security guys. Not all of them. And not everything they say. But most of the shit they bring up is total bullshit.

97
Silk Road discussion / Re: feedback system overhaul
« on: August 12, 2013, 09:41 am »
The buyers should see nothing bit the feedback left...BUT internally...the feedback from a high priced order, from a buyer that has big stats..should be weighted a lot more then a buyer with zero stats on a $1 item.

Also an item that was free or near free...should not even be counted or seen. As a potential buyer can't tell if the feedback is from a $0 item....or from someone that ordered $15k  in items.

Also if buyers just stayed in escrow...they would eliminate a lot of headaches.

98
Silk Road discussion / Re: feedback system overhaul
« on: August 12, 2013, 09:13 am »

#2 -- Similarly, showing buyer weight in feedback is only useful to a buyer if the heavy-weight is being honest.  But their position of power can also have the opposite effect intended.  For example, when other buyers are able to see buyer weight, this gives the vendor an incentive to treat the heavy-weight in a special manner (or worse, bribe them).  This problem would worsen if you implementing a way to sort the feedback based on buyer weight as well.


Do you not realize we already see the buyer that you call a "heavy-weight" information???? So we already know he is a heavy-weight??? Also a guy that spends 14k on an order....is already going to be treated  different then a guy who spends $76. Unless you deal with a vendor like myself...that treats every buyer like his order is 14k. Though to be honest...I do not know how you would treat one guy "better" then the other.

At the end of the day...are only job is to get the buyer their order as fast and safe as possible. And as a vendor...you should want to do that with every order you except...and I believe that 98% of vendors do that already.


 Also why would the "buyer" need to "see" anything? I think it is something that would be behind the scenes...as it is now. As in how the feedback is "weighted". That the buyer who spends 15k and leaves a 5/5 feedback is more heavy weighted... then a buyer that spends $1. Also a buyer that has been around for 1 year...that has spent 100k+ ...that has200+ orders...and has used 10+ vendors...should have more weight then the buyer that has been here for 1 day, spent $5, placed 1 order. This would actually HELP that little guy that is just starting. It would also take away the power of a vendor that creates his own feedback with $0 priced items from a buyer account that has no stats.

Also you do realize that the good vendors...do not need to...and have no reason too...ever bribe or do anything like that at all..meaning they do not need to manipulate their feedback in anyway. PERIOD.

The feedback system should be in place to help the buyer understand that the vendor is legit and trustworthy. And a vendor that has been around a long time, that handles high volume and high priced volume should be more trusted then a new vendor that does neither. And the fact is that if you chose that vendor...and you do not FE..then you are in great shape.

In fact....you can choose any vendor...and be in great shape if you just FE. PERIOD.

99
Silk Road discussion / Re: feedback system overhaul
« on: August 12, 2013, 07:57 am »
@ DPR

How about limiting the time frame someone can edit their feedback. Also if they do edit it...then make it so the original can stay up there. Also make it so that if a buyer go's to resolution and loses....  they can not leave feedback.

I think you should take a que from eBay. Also a lot of buyers use the feedback system to thank the vendor. I do not think it would be a good idea to not have them leave comments but a link to leave them somewhere on the forums...as a lot of people will not take the time to do that. Also a lot of buyers are not forum members.. I know there are buyers who have spent over $100k+ that do not have forum accounts.

What is important for the buyer is to know how long the seller has been here for...how many transactions they have done successfully. I know you put the 300 there for a reason....as maybe you thought it was "bad" if a vendor showed they have done 4000 transactions...as they would not like LE to target them. And if they feel that way then they can go into stealth.

But the fact is...that if you are a vendor with over 4000 transactions and all of them are 5/5...then you should be rewarded...and I would think a buyer would feel a lot better using a vendor with those stats...then one with 200 transactions... and some 5/5.

Also you commented how a vendor could sell themselves $0 listings and leave themselves feedback. I actually think this happens a lot less then others seem to think...BUT the fact is it can happen. So it would make a lot of sense that feedback for transactions over $500 or whatever amount you feel is right...from buyers who have purchased over $25k in orders... should have a lot more weight...A LOT MORE... then a $0 order from a newbie. And I saw that you now do that...I think at least on the $$ side...but I think it should even have more weight....Also I do not think you have it where a buyer that has spent $25k+ has more weight then a buyer that has spent $300.

The bottom line is feedback is there to help others trust that vendor. So anything that addresses that is good.

100
Shipping / Re: I'm currently a U.S. mailman...
« on: August 12, 2013, 07:12 am »

Heres the mailman saying nobody gives a shit,  wheres RXKing he will love this. 

I am here. I happen to KNOW all this is true. That is why I say what I do. I also happen to not think that every time SR's down that the FBI has taken over. Sorry I do not by Astor's bullshit lie's.

I also have been here for 17 months, never lose one package and never had a problem after my first week. Also all my feedback/s are 5/5. I just like fact's and not what if's.

Do you guy's realize how much paranoid bullshit is in these forums? Then some poor guy  that is high as shit reads them....then passes it on as fact's. I hate that. I like truth.

101
Silk Road discussion / Re: How credible is a review really?I
« on: August 10, 2013, 08:18 am »
I ask this because sometimes i see review where the guy says it took too long however he still gave a 5 out of 5 review. I find this puzzling.

You are puzzled because an order took to long, yet he still left 5/5?? What is so puzzling about that? Maybe for him "too long" is 20 hours? We will never know because you give us a tiny bit of feedback left and it is out of context.
 
Also i find it a pain in the arse because as a newbie Im still skeptical about putting my money in BTC and buying drugs over the internet.

You are on a site that has been available for over 2 years. MILLIONS of dollars are spent buying drugs by tens of thousands of people and under normal circumstances 99% of orders go through with out a hitch. Yet you find it a pain in the arse because you are skeptical. **PAGING ASTOR LINE 1** PAGING ASTOR LINE 1 " we have a newbie here that is perfect for you and Pine to recruit!

So i rely heavily upon review to guide my decisions however when all i see is 5 out of 5 reviews all the time i found this pointless. I mean could a guy bump up his reviews somehow? What do you guys think?S
 is 100% accurate.

Not sure what you mean by" review guide" as there is no such thing on Silk Road. But it sounds like you are referring to vendors feedback. The reason you see a lot of 5/5's is because a lot of people are very happy and received their drugs. I can tell already that you do not want to believe this. As you are still puzzled that someone said it took too long and you do not understand why that buyer didn't leave a 1/5. I will help you solve the puzzle...that guy left the 5/5 probably because he was very happy with his drugs and he realizes that sometimes things in the mail take time. Maybe he lives in Argentina and he ordered weed from Germany. In that case it could have taken 10 days and that is a "long time" to wait, but in reality... that is just the standard time for an order. So though he hated to wait, he got his drugs and he is not a dick or an idiot so he left the 5/5.

Or maybe it was a buyer of mine that ordered from me at 6pm EST and he received it the next day at 11am. And because he has a sense of humor, he put " took to long". As 17 hours coast to coast in America is a "long time". ;)

Astor said this

Forum reviews are definitely more informative than feedback on the market. After a while you will start to recognizing people on the forum, and you will get a sense for who the informed reviewers are. I've gotten to know people in the community than I can ask directly about vendors of specific drugs, and I know I can trust their reviews. That saves a lot of time in the long run.

And though his very first sentence is 100% accurate. Him answering your post and questions with this response, just shows how out of touch he is. And how bad his advice is. You are a guy that does not even trust bitcoins or SR yet!!! And you never asked " What is better in determining how to choose a vendor? By  reading the feedback's of vendors on there vendor page(s) or by reading the forums and finding reviews there?"

Had you asked that..then Astor's response would have still been terrible at best. As the only thing he says that is accurate is his first sentence. As Hungry Ghost CORRECTLY pointed out...forum reviews are spotty at best and should be taken with a grain of salt. As a lot of them are coming from a shill account or from someone that was given a freebee to write a review. In fact there are "hero" members in this forum that only get their drugs this way. As they are broke dick losers. "Paging......" just playin..

But of course the OP never asked that. He did of course ask----

I mean could a guy bump up his reviews somehow? What do you guys think?S
 is 100% accurate.

And as usual Astor in his post never addresses the question you ask. In fact what he does do is ignore your question and instead tells you how you should go to the forums and read them and find a "trusted reviewer" (that is like saying an honest politician or a smart girl). The very thing you ask "if it can be bumped up"...so to speak.

What you should do is read all the feedback on the vendors page. And then find the exact drug you want and read the vendors feedback for that item. Make sure they have them!( feedback) Also since you are so paranoid and a skeptic, I would suggest you choose a vendor that has been here over a year and has a perfect feedback rating(100), has over 300 transactions, and happens to be in your home country. And most importantly....uses PGP!

FUCK NO! ;D I was kidding about the pgp...the most important thing is NEVER FINALIZE EARLY! And as long as you follow that simple rule. You can not lose your money. And if you stick with a vendor that has been here over a year, with a 100 feedback and has over 300 transactions and you stay in escrow(meaning do not FE) then you will 100% get the drug you ordered. (Do not use RxKing)

Good luck

102
Newbie discussion / Re: Y U NO USE PGP RxKing?
« on: August 10, 2013, 06:52 am »
Eh. I've always browsed on these forums and wanted to actively engage in them; though the whole 50 posts thing (while I understand why) always seemed to keep me away. However, like many others paranoid with the Road being down after FreedomHosting being toppled, I went to the thread "is the road down?" just to browse a bit. After chuckling, I stumbled upon the little debate between StExo and RxKing and felt completely mystified that a long-time vendor could be so adamant against the use of PGP. Astor and StExo did a decent job proving you wrong, but I'd like to weigh in my 2 cents in my first post.

So I'd certainly welcome any debate if either of you happen to stumble upon the Newbie Discussion and join in.

But let me examine a few of your quotes RxKing...

"Now what happens when that vendor that uses PGP decides to write every address down and save them? How did your pgp help you there? It did not!!! It did nothing for you...pgp gives buyers a false sense of security and offers no true security. If you want REAL security as a buyer, then you should only deal with a vendor that would never do something so stupid(as to keep anything at all ever) a vendor that has proven over a long period of time that they should be trusted, and a vendor that knows what the fuck he is doing."

     I certainly agree with this sentiment. You certainly have to hope that the vendor knows what they're doing. It's like you said, what happens if they find a written address or a package with your address on it before they get to the post office (it is illegal to open mail though, but LE blows)? But I would argue that a vendor who uses PGP is simply using an EXTRA layer of easy-to-learn protection and doesn't show some unnecessary stubbornness, so I feel as though they should be smart enough to delete any information and take necessary precautions. Unfortunately, when we don't advocate use of PGP there are dumb vendors that will then advocate privnote or other means...While I will of course never use such means, dumb and new buyers will fall prey to this. We could accept the mentality that dumb people get burned, but veterans should be looking out for new members of the road...The more we have using PGP and tor, the safer I feel we become.
     However, this is all based on your fundamental belief that the Silk Road is not compromised. You say right before that:

"I for one do not think SR will get compromised. And if I am wrong, and it is, then I do not think an address means anything. In fact I KNOW it does not. Not one person would ever get prosecuted or have anything happen to them based on an address found somewhere on the darknet."

    But what about an address attached to a person who's transaction history shows THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of dollars?  Would it be smart for their address to be open anywhere if the silkroad is compromised, especially for a smaller than usual purchase? If the vendor somehow were compromised... say he falls for a phishing scam or somehow LE got a hold of their user (hey, its happened)? Sure your argument is that the vendor fucked up but having one password is not the same thing as having two. He could've left the road logged in on his computer when DEA busted down his door and put the barrel to his face. They still can't get that next password for the PGP outta him thanks to our 5th amendment. As for the road being compromised... Here's another quote from you:

"I am sure I have mailed packages to the DEA. As long as the finalize fast and do not ask stupid questions,I am fine with it. I actually treat every single package as if it is going to the DEA or FBI."

     If that's how you feel, is it not entirely possible then that the SilkRoad is a giant honeypot or run by LE? Sure it sounds pretty paranoid, but about as paranoid as treating every package as though its going to the DEA. In this fucked up War on Drugs, you'd be surprised by the attempts that LE takes. They could have addresses of the people buying kilos of whatever and having them shipped over seas to whatever country because that text is in the open instead of hidden. You bust a couple people here and there, and you have enough money to keep getting congressional appropriations to fight the very thing you're behind...and viola probably another promotion for popping the guy that got 10 kilos of mdma from overseas; besides you can't get much higher on the food chain without going to the country that sent it, so you just take down the big sharks in your own country. In addition you also consider that maybe you do some shit like this:

"I can mail someone a package and make it come from Boston when I am in Los Angele's. Again, this is not about me and how I ship or what to do or not do."

    Sure this may not be what you do...but if you do something even remotely like this, you're passing off my address information to someone else, and its very well (well actually guaranteed given your history) that you didnt encrypt my information before you sent it along so that information is potentially exposed once again. Thanks dickhead!

     I do hope you realize that an address exposed only once on the darknet or somewhere else can mean your downfall. Addresses can be saved and crosschecked with ANY MAIL. PERIOD. Ever heard of the Mail Isolation and Tracking program? Started in 2001 after the Anthrax scares (and certainly scary in the pre-PRISM era), USPS takes a picture of EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF MAIL. Flagged addresses can certainly be examined with a more scrupulous eye if they think you're high on that food chain. Likewise, over time, they CAN and WILL figure out patterns; hence why StExo says you can be found. Maybe he can't personally, but if someone really wants to, they probably can. And I'd be more than happy my address isn't anywhere near your computer or residence.
    Sure this is all a level of encryption based on paranoia and highly unlikely scenarious; but paranoia is a good thing and keeps you safe. MuhFuckers have families and priors and shit.
     AND THERE IS NOT A SINGLE PLACE YOU CAN FIND FAULT IN THE TECHNOLOGY OF PGP; it helps reduce human error. And its so simple. I honestly learned it and set-up my private and public key in about the same amount of time it took to disable scripts and fuck with my settings every time I download a new bundle for tor. So to sit here and deem it "WORTHLESS" or that it "adds nothing"... But that is a blatant lie when it works wonders as an added level of protection which you cannot discount. Its ridiculously reckless that you can have the title of 'hero member' just because you may post so often when you're doing this community a huge disservice. People might actually listen to your bullshit.
     PGP is not a second fucking condom; its the birth control, in addition. It's not some second layer that puts you at more risk of the whole thing blowing up. Sure it can have its flaws the same as clear text, but generally its proven safer and more effective.
     The only reason you could possibly advocate against using extra protection is that you lack the modicum of intelligence necessary to understand it (and its necessity) or implement it; and you should be prevented from participating in this community when you encourage others to act as reckless as yourself.

Just wanted a record of this OP...so that I can hammer it  ;D

103
Newbie discussion / Re: Y U NO USE PGP RxKing?
« on: August 10, 2013, 06:51 am »
I will gladly debate with you about this.

Though you need to try and learn the "Quote" system in writing a post as without it...it is very hard to read.

But I think you should know what I am talking about before you debate me.

I have my opinion on this for 17 months. And when I say "pgp is worthless" I am only talking about, in the context of putting your address on the order form. That's it!

Also, as I will do with you, if you disagree with me on a point, then please address that exact point. I will of course do the same.
Also be honest. Do not make up things. I mean you kind of already made some things up...but I will let it slide. I am referring to you saying

Astor and StExo did a decent job proving you wrong

This is laughable! By "decent" do you mean they didn't at all? Please tell me where Astor and StExo proved me wrong!!! It never happened. Actually most people in the tread agreed with me. This is a fact. And both Astor and StExo left the tread. I believe Astor only made one post where he quoted me and then had a response for what I said. You should really read it again. he didn't prove anything. As to StExo I can not even remember what he wrote. But again he in no way proved me wrong. So though you lied in here..or at the very least used poor wording..I will let it slide.

Also what must be pointed out is that I am not paranoid. I do not think that every time SR go's down that the FBI has taken it over. These guys do. If you are going to try and debate me...then stick with facts..and  not what if's, or could have's. Stick to real life, real time., actual events. I will do the same.

You can see even in this thread....A troll is the one person that say's something negative about me...Fittesaft. This is a guy that has 30 negative Karma and 2 positive. Also he says nothing other then I sound like a moron. If you want to go through the thread you are referencing earlier...you should see how many people agree with me...and how many agree with STexo/Astor.

Also you will see that Astor,STexo and the like..take this personally. They can't fathom that someone disagrees with them.

I think you should really read the Op you made...It has a lot of holes in it.

I am ready when you are :)




104
Silk Road discussion / Re: Do bitcoin vendors pay SR fee?
« on: August 10, 2013, 03:41 am »
This has been addressed many a time in the forums.

SR does not administer a fee for bitcoin vendors because you can not use the escrow system.

SR in fact, discourages anyone from buying coin through a silk road vendor.

Nice 2 hear from you RX....It's me Tony..Just wanted 2 say Hi buddy.

I see your on a meth run again....doesn't it get old?

105
Silk Road discussion / Re: Do bitcoin vendors pay SR fee?
« on: August 10, 2013, 03:08 am »
This has been addressed many a time in the forums.

SR does not administer a fee for bitcoin vendors because you can not use the escrow system.

SR in fact, discourages anyone from buying coin through a silk road vendor.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 ... 67