You should look into pinenarchy. I've heard lots of arguments against anarcho this or that, but never pinenarchy. I agree incidentally, that a strong central, small but powerful state is necessary for markets to begin. The data supports that idea. However I am also convinced that the world will be stranger. The most extreme anarcho-capitalists with new ideas are the Cypherpunks, and frankly I've yet to hear any rebuttal of it. It is interesting that you bring arguments against anarcho-capitalism on SR, since after all although SR is very heavily inspired by anarcho-capitalism, it is really more properly described as anarcho-cypher-capitalism. It is not a construct that could possibly exist in the physical world or as plaintext in the virtual one. The shorthand for anarcho-cypher-capitalism is cryptoanarchy.None of the philosophers have thought of this, it would have been too much of a leap, and that I find very interesting indeed. This is a genuine New Thing. See, despite appearances, cryptoanarchy isn't a highly specific concept, it just sounds like one. It is really a very general concept.Despite the fact Julian Assange even wrote a entire book about the Cypherpunks, almost nobody in the media or government grasps the long term ramifications of such developments. The Silk Road, Bitcoin, the darknets and cryptocurrencies are just the start of a long term secular change in society. Fortunately nobody believes this, even when they hear it, it is the platypus flavoring, otherwise they'd probably put a stop to it by any means possible.Here is a thread where we discussed anarchy and cryptoanarchy earlier. See if you can come up with arguments against cryptoanarchy, that'll be something that hasn't been done before.http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=139891.0