It looks like Rothbard's critique of Agorism is related to Ronald Coarse's The Nature of the Firm.There is a good synopsis here: http://www.anthonyflood.com/rothbardkonkin.htmAnd konkin's rebuttal to rothbard: http://www.anthonyflood.com/konkinreplytorothbard.htmI'm speedreading, but it appears from this that Konkin's vision of Agorism would mean everybody's an independent contractor. Rothbard sees this as absurd, we need group organization like corporations etc.It looks like the transaction costs argument. That some transactions are too expensive and must be internalized within units of organization called corporations instead of being all market based. Rothbard then says there are severe limitations to the scope of the black market being used for freedom (Konkin's argument), because practical stuff like making cars, concrete factories have no reason to be black market economy stuff. Essentially he accuses Konkin of overly focusing on exotic elements e.g. illegal drugs rather than the more mundane production necessary for the world.--I think it would be very interesting to know what Rothbard and Konkin would think about cryptocurrencies! It is possible Rothbard is completely correct in 1980 and completely wrong in 2020!Must add: I find left wing libertarians seriously confusing animals. I don't see what's left wing about them exactly. They seem to think being against American policies is somehow an automatic left wing position, but markets and/or private ownership is ok. As far as I'm concerned meritocracy and egalitarianism are exact opposites. Somebody explain to me how these dudes live with themselves, they seem neither fish nor fowl to me.