Quote from: maniacsxc on September 03, 2012, 09:54 amCmd-Shallies said he did not believe websites offering drugs online were based out of WA or Australia.``The sites identified to date are offshore,'' he said.``This is consistent with most cyber related offences.''This is what I cannot understand. I quite literally cannot comprehend how he arrives at these conclusions.Again and again, the AFP and other Aussie LE have implied that SR is somewhere else, over the rainbow maybe.There is. No way. They could. Possibly. Know that.There is no way to determine if a hidden service is in country X (save if you manage to deanonymize it of course).If there is no way to determine if a hidden service is in country X, then if follows that you cannot possibly say you know for sure that it is not inside your territory.I mean, I'm ok with NIMBYism per se, but the irrationality of it is annoying. A hidden service is just as likely to be situated in the same country as the person who set it up, as a completely different country.Oh yeah, and you bet your life that that 800+ number factors in all the "illegal steroids" they found. They alwaysdo that to boost the numbers.If you want a true picture of what is going on, read the AFP's annual reports, they are freely available on the web.The vast majority of intercepts are very large deliveries indeed e.g. > 1kg."Identified to date" my ass. He means he found a link to SR on wikipedia. I did too, but I didn't make such grandiose claimswith wordplay.