I doubt they have a case. Even if B$ is considered as legally equivalent to the dollar, which it won't be seeing as it's not legal tender in the eyes of the law currently, there is no legal obligation for a website to adopt sound security practices unless they are legally obligated to. An online bank has a fiduciary duty, but I don't think a bitcoin wallet or exchange has the same responsibility. I mean, I think they *should*, and that bitcoin ought to be recognized as legal tender (otherwise how the fuck do money laundering charges stick? :D ), but wishing don't make it so.They are making a big noise, but that is all it is. I cannot think of a precedent they could appeal to. Obviously I'm no lawyer, but we'll see if I'm wrong soon enough.The big danger isn't the claim, but the extreme cost of legal fees, they are trying to get something out of the Bitcoinica people in the hope that hurting Intersango's reputation and pocket book will force them to cooperate.So because of the threat of legal fees there is still a danger that Intersango could feel compelled to 'take the money and run', which is a bit of a self fulfilling prophesy in some sense given that some people claim the Bitcoinica theft was an inside job. We'll never know of course.IMHO, it will just get thrown straight out of court.Also: Fuck the Law(yers). They're crippling America and the West in general, I think even anti-SR LE agents would agree with that unpleasant synopsis.