Quote from: kmfkewm on May 16, 2012, 08:42 amA thread asking this question was locked on the grounds that it would reveal information that only vendors need to knowhttp://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=23271.0The point of this post is to point out that it is stupid to lock such a thread for many reasons, one being that the information is pretty much common knowledge.Limetless has made a category mistake. Probably an honest mistake rather than self interest. The threshold quantities for generating a SAR report are actually well known. It is even the subject of an episode of The Sopranos. And it has been mentioned before on this forum, I think I myself mentioned a while back that you ought to half the threshold quantity as a precaution with whatever laundering schema you're using.There a very short list of things we can develop/work out that a LEO cannot figure out for themselves.Dissemination of powerful, accurate information for all buyers and vendors is a big part of why this forum exists. As a general rule, a fluent network benefits us far far more than it does LE listening to the grapevine.Some things ought to be censored, but these almost always come under the category of keeping anonymity.e.g. If I told the forum:- a specific buyer's address, even order details- how a specific vendor packages his product- how a specific person launders capital- how a specific person synthesizes productthat would be a mistake. This is always secret sauce. That is why PGP.However, general information about how to package product, launder capital or synthesize product ought to be spread as much as possible. Otherwise all of pine's tutorials ought to be locked as well. And the Polyfront should be a banned onion URL etc. (http://2po5jdzeffv2kyv3.onion/polyfront/)Another example: Let us say that we're talking about cashing out bitcoins by the use of some manner of credit card or debit card. In that case you should describe the process of making it work properly, but ideally you shouldn't prescribe a specific product on the market i.e. everybody else can just use search engines for the appropriate keywords and come to their own conclusions independently on what products to use. This is because mentioning the specific provider might result in LE red flagging everything to do with that provider if they are popular here, and not the other dozen providers with identical services that are less popular here.Not asking for perfection, moderation is more art than science. Just don't do LEO's job for them - err on the side of being liberal.btw: mad pine is very mad, its postcount is ruined >.<btw2: haven't forgotten, hashing script is nearing completion