hatedpatriot, there are a lot of problems with both the idea and the method used. I agree with your motivation, just not with the means of achieving the goal.- the resolution is very low, you are preventing anybody in a zip code recieving just because of a scammer. Eventually, huge areas would be off limits to SR's services for no reason.- you are effectively making the zip code public, you're giving LE potentially useful information about the approximate location of buyers, even if they are scammers. - worst of all, it appears you would be storing the approximate locations of legitimate buyers too. All of the problems are fixed by using a hash algorithm. It potentially allows everybody to share information about the addresses of potential scammers, without actually sharing the addresses themselves. I describe its use and the potential caveats in detail here:http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=20910.msg212838#msg212838I am currently coding a version that any vendor can use, and it shouldn't take very long to achieve. If you've any questions ask away.