Hello chapsIt occurs to me that having a "packaging barcode" on a package or envelope isn't such a hot idea. I don't think they are usually intended to be scanned by the Mail Office, but that could change since scanning millions of them is an easily automated thing, it's what barcodes are designed for.Can't know for certain, but it's probably the case that these barcodes for bundles of packages you buy in bulk come in a sequence or some other pattern.Hence, for high volume vendors, it serves as a potential 'return address' for LEO to red flag, irrespective of anything else on the package or inside it.Then they can work out what company you bought it from, what box you acquired and what payment method used, IP address used to access the website et al. Or worst, the post office or shop at which you bought them. Seems like a problem to me.Before you think, ah, that's obvious, it might well be, but the fact remains that the majority of professional looking business mail packages use barcodes, small or large ones.You cannot cut out the barcode and put a sticky label over it for the return address, since LEO is sure to happily adopt that as a new red flag.So, you ideally need pro packaging, which is used very frequently in the business world because it's an 'in-bulk' kind of deal, but which doesn't use barcodes on it's packaging.So far, I'm quite alright since my shipping quantities are extremely tiny, but it's still a problem. Especially for our weed vendors, who really need decent sized packages.Ideas? Comments?