Quote from: supersecretsquirrel on February 03, 2012, 03:16 amQuote from: pine on February 03, 2012, 02:56 am> implying child porn is available on the Silk Road.Goldberg knows full well that is not true.The journalist didn't imply that child porn was available on Silk Road, just that it was available on various hidden services. The "dark net" is more than just Silk Road -- it's most often used as a term for /all/ .onion sites.No, he is implying that there is child porn on SR itself. The way we read that article is not how a member of the public will read it. If you google dark net and drugs you will almost exclusively find references to the Silk Road. He uses the singular 'market', not markets. He is a journalist using sleight of hand to become even more of an attention whore than he already is.