Quote from: flashlight5 on July 09, 2013, 11:51 amthat vendor should get a warning.freedom is great, but he is mainly putting other people in danger. i suggest a change in policy here. vendor must provide at least xxx bit encryption.Not going to happen, ever. Quite some time ago, DPR and I had an exchange on this very issue, and DPR reiterated their stance that use of PGP on the part of vendors is completely voluntary. DPR is philosophically opposed to the notion of requiring/forcing vendors to use PGP -- I get the impression that it offends his agorist sensibilities. Hell is going to freeze-over before I see this changing. Nightcrawler