Quote from: orngecapsule on October 27, 2012, 06:57 pmmrdobolina orngecapsule-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----Version: BCPG v1.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1bmz-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----What is the point of publishing a new key, when it's equally as unsafe as the old key? gpg --list-keys mrdobolinapub 1024D/898F6652 2012-09-03uid         mrdobolina <mrdobolina@tormail.org>sub  512g/00CC2705 2012-09-03pub 1024D/4A356F6E 2012-10-27uid         mrdobolina <mrdobolina1@tormail.com>sub  512g/4B5CBF15 2012-10-27Both these keys have 512-bit moduli -- these keys are _so_ unsafe, it's mind-boggling.