Quote from: breathe on August 03, 2012, 07:38 amI don't think any of you get what I'm saying. Police don't give enough of a shit about small buyers to warrant spending money and man hours tracking them down, that's a fact.In a number of places, but there are definitely others where they do care. Just because it is true where you live is no reason to encourage practices which may be very dangerous in other parts of the world. Your gram of MDMA may not mean much to your local cops, but in other parts of the world it can lead to years in prison.Quote from: breathe on August 03, 2012, 07:38 amThere's virtually no added risk for someone buying small amounts without PGP. Therefore there's no incentive for your average joe to use it.Then that's a risk that each buyer needs to make. Vendors should all be using PGP/GPG as a standard practice (they can also use PrivacyBox to receive messages from those buyers who refuse to use it).Quote from: breathe on August 03, 2012, 07:38 amAnd to the idiots joking about $60 being the magic number below which no one gets prosecuted (which isn't even what I was saying), I've got one for you: how about anyone without PGP is going to be instantly arrested and charged the second they place an order. That's about the same as the way you summed up my argument.Your argument basically amounted to: I don't think that I am at risk by not using encryption for the amount I buy and the fact that it is not imported, so the same should be true for everyone else.The first part of your argument may or may not be true, but at the end of the day it is your choice (until all the vendors insist on using PGP and then they've made the choice for you). The second part of your argument; that it is okay for all other buyers, who may be in very different jurisdictions with very different laws is where you are full of shit. Just because you believe that your decision is right for you, does NOT mean it is right for anyone else here.