Quote from: Shannon on July 28, 2012, 08:03 pmQuote from: LouisCyphre on July 28, 2012, 11:03 amI just looked at the first table on that link. I can see why it was rejected. I'd've been opposed solely based on the reliance on BCPG for the encryption library.that's an implementation wrinkle, my understanding was that the design itself was flawedWhich is exactly the kind of analysis I don't really have the time for at the moment. You're right, though, BCPG could be replaced with GPG by a C coder of sufficient proficiency.