Dammnnn Libertas Don't fuck around!
He's good with a banhammer. A bit of a cumbersome weapon, banhammers...
Not if the rules are followed.
Libertas
I play by my own rules...
Plus, you know I'm baiting you into an argument about semantics and how OG DPR supposedly commissioned six murders, so whatever lofty and hypocritical pseudo-sacrosanct shenanigans he setdown about not sending scammers shit in the mail and how I broke Silk Road canon either of us is going to spin is going to turn into butthurt. You will win inevitably, but your banhammer cost me in today's money in downtime and lost funds about $30-50k conservatively. So the fact that I'm remaining chivalrous in any regard should be a consideration toward my compliance toward following future rules, and a pretty good test of my loyalty towards the brand.
So let's agree to disagree. Shall we? It was cute when bitcoin was $100. At $1000... I think I have a decent right to be royally pissed at the moment considering "SR Quality Control" was issuing warnings and fines to vendors for out of escrow transgressions and such, which is tantamount to theft, so the fact that I got worse treatment than a thief in my opinion is a little fucked up and I'm sure I can scrounge up some people who'd agree with me if I had the inclination.
I'm not going to comment on your previous transgressions, GroovyBruce; I stated that "banhammers" are not "cumbersome weapons" when the rules are followed which is a simple truth stemming from the fact that when the rules are followed then taking action with such tools is, of course, not necessary.
If you wish to continue your shenanigans here you are free to do so but you should know from the outset that it will do you no favours, neither on your "GroovyBruce" account nor any other.
Consider this my final response to the matter currently under discussion.
Libertas
P.S. About "shenanigans" - I just
had to!