CP producers don't molest the users of CP either??? There is no disconnect in the analogy, you say people viewing CP causes children to be molested (dubious) I say that people buying drugs cause people to be murdered (obvious). Drug users must advocate the killing of innocents (it is not true that the cartels only kill cartel members, they kill fucking everybody), because they buy drugs even though the circumstances are such that they are funding murderers! By your logic we should put the blame for the murders of the drug cartels on the people who buy the drugs, and not the people who kill or order killings. And killing has to be part of the equation with a serial killer getting stories of his killings published in the newspapers so people can read them, do you therefore hold responsible for murder the readers of a newspaper that details for entertainment value the exploits of a serial killer? You really need to do some pretty serious mental gymnastics to say that people who view images of CP are responsible for child molestation while claiming that drug users are not responsible for the murders of cartels or that readers of newspaper articles on serial killings are not responsible for murders. PS: The holocaust was required for images of the holocaust, should we charge all who view those images with war crimes? Okay so how do you feel about not for profit CP distribution via PIR, where the demand for CP can not be determined. You just dodge the main point I am trying to make by making your hypothetical situations more and more convoluted. We can address any potential for demand to lead to supply. We can address any potential for anybody to profit off of people viewing CP. Even assuming that you are correct, which I certainly do not, we can address perfectly the issues that you bring up. Repeating these issues over and over at this point is to ignore the fact that if they are real they can be addressed.