Ah Brooke Shields, there are some images of her that are more or less identical to softcore CP images from Eastern Europe, but her images have been declared as legal and art! Just like the vietnamese girl burning from napalm is legal but a picture of some random girl burned by a pedophile is illegal. Emotion should not have a role in dictating the law, only logic. So if I want to see 40 year old cock in 18 year old holes I am perfectly normal and that is just A-okay, but subtract 1-4 years from the 18 year old and omfg I am a huge pedophile and should be burned alive most likely. Even though you cannot reliably tell if someone is 14.5 or 18 years old by looking at them? Even though nearly all men have the same sexual response to 14.5 year olds as they do to 18 year olds? What exactly is so cold about that? It is similar to how it is legal to fuck 16 year olds all day in the UK but as soon as you look at a picture of a 16 year old flashing you are a horrible pedophile and should be burned at the stake! What is the magical property of photography that you guys are seeing, that makes it so it is not immoral to look directly at the breasts of a 16 year old, but a horrible sin to look at the photograph of the same breasts?!