It is not an illegitmate comparison at all. It isn't even a comparison. Not thinking about a subject and not talking about a subject and "Just say no" is ALWAYS wrong, it doesn't matter what the subject in reference is, the idea of mental self censorship and censorship of verbal expression of opinion and the idea that we should blindly hold to a belief without rational analysis exists independently of drugs and of CP and it is ALWAYS bad. You should not even stop thinking about serial killing and stop talking about serial killing and just say no to serial killing, you should think about serial killing and why it is wrong, you should talk about serial killing and how it is wrong and debate with anyone who thinks it is right, you should not just say no to serial killing you should be able to say why serial killing is wrong. There is no comparison, "just say no" exists independently of anything and it is always wrong. What I said means no such thing. If you cannot parse the idea that intent draws a clear distinction between these two things, that is your failure and people need to realize that your opinion can be safely ignored in this category of discussion. You have forfeited your opinion from a serious discussion about this real problem that is happening today in the space of our shared reality. [/quote] Why not put my entire quote? If the intent of a Nazi looking at images of the holocaust is to derive pleasure from the extermination of the Jews, using your logic it should be highly illegal for said Nazi to look at the image, because of his intent. Having one set of rules for people who enjoy pictures of the holocaust and one set of rules for people who find such images to be disgusting means you want to be the thought police, plain and simple. If someone looks at pictures of the holocaust and they think "This is horrible!" you think it should not be illegal, but if they look at pictures of the holocaust and think "This is awesome!" then it should be illegal. You want to make the thoughts people have about external stimuli illegal, and this indeed means you are the fucking thought police. I am not the primary cause, the things I am saying are the primary cause. People cannot even bother to think about what I am saying because their emotional response to the subject is too strong, it clouds their mind and turns them into creatures hardly better than wild animals.