Just so you know 'virtual' images are already pretty near to photorealistic (link is not porn): https://lh3.ggpht.com/_nIWiKIscZJY/SRZ5DYl6DiI/AAAAAAAABWE/tcSAK_PoURw/s400/airb.jpg (this is a painting though actually) here is CGI: http://www.wired.com/design/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/marco_photo_vs_render_v2_660px.jpg (half is CGI half is a real photograph, looks pretty close to me). But yeah so imagine someone makes an image that is photorealistic and it depicts a child, but the child is not real and no molestation took place. You are okay with this right?