I see a lot of people claiming that "most CP is rape or snuff" and "70% of CP is violent rape", but I see no citations for these figures. When I counter this with my own extreme doubt in regard to these figures, while pointing out that I am not certain, I am called out for talking out of my ass. Well, where are your citations for these statistics? I can give citations that only 1:5 people arrested with CP have violent CP in their collections, and that only means a single image out of possibly thousands. I can give citations for studios that produced millions of softcore images with consent of parents. I can give citations for how something like 25% of all teenagers in the USA have produced CP of themselves, that is a pretty big number right? So where are you citations for 70% of CP being violent or for almost all CP being rape or snuff? I am really interested to read these studies because so far I have not found anything on it. Of course, it doesn't make any difference is 100% of CP is rape or snuff, but I just wonder if you guys are just emotionally fear mongering people or if you actually have any evidence for your claims. I don't support people causing the abuse of children. Nothing I have done in my life has ever led to a single child being abused in any way, and this will remain true for my entire life. I have never told someone to molest children, or paid for anyone to molest children, or in general done anything that can be seen as having caused harm to come upon a child. I have never defended the people who molest children and I have never suggested that it is okay for people to molest children. So I don't see how I would be seen as someone who supports child porn, I merely support the right of people to view child porn. I support the right of people to view images of the holocaust as well, does that mean I am a Nazi supporter? You think at age 18 people have the knowledge of sexuality come down from the heavens and enlighten them? That is a strange idea to hold. Sure thing! And it is legal in many parts of the world at that. Who am I to tell a 14 year old who they can fuck or to tell a semi-retarded middle-aged man who they can fuck? As long as they are not fucking children without awareness and free agency I do not care. A 14 year old should have developed free agency by that point in their life. If a man tells a 6 year old to touch him in a sexual way, the 6 year old probably will as they do not understand the implications and they are likely to trust an adult. If a man tells a 14 year old the same and the 14 year old does it I can only imagine that the 14 year old had an active personal desire to do so, as 14 year olds are much more cognitively developed than 6 year olds. I said that pedophiles typically have low intelligence. Men fond of 14 year olds are not pedophiles, are not considered to have any mental illness at all, and indeed studies show that they are quite normal in that they are average men. A 14 year old who kills a person will be charged as if they are an adult, an 18 year old who has sex with a 14 year old will be charged as if the 14 year old is a child. A 6 year old who kills a person will not be charged, an 18 year old who has sex with a 6 year old will be charged for having sex with a child. I think we all can see that society is hypocritical on certain issues. A 14 year old is an adult when they want them to be, and capable of making the adult choice to illegally take the life of another, but they are not capable of touching another in a sexual way without being manipulated? It is no different than the sick and twisted society of the USA saying that a 20 year old is old enough to be forced into war to die fighting and killing but not old enough to drink alcohol.