No I read it, I just don't see what it has to do with viewing child pornography. It starts out saying all pornography is bad because it objectifies females. Uhm, yeah... okay. Then it talks about some poor girl who was abducted and murdered by a sex offender, which has about nothing to do with child pornography being legal or illegal to view. Then it said the internet has made all porn, including child porn, much more common, which I already knew and is obvious and is actually one of my original arguments for why CP will be legal to view within a few hundred years and why the original reasoning for making it illegal (it funds child molestation) is now pretty irrelevant. Then it talks about how legal adult pornography is really bad some more, makes the sexist claim that , and suggests that parents filter the internet so their kids don't look at legal porn. I really am just not seeing the relevance of this at all please explain it to me.