Banks don't consent to being robbed, and bank robberies are illegal, why don't you want to charge people who look at video footage of bank robberies? Your argument cannot possibly boil down to "children can not consent" because the principle behind that would be it should be illegal to look at images of crimes that involve a victim who did not consent, but you do not want to charge people for looking at bank robbery footage do you? So you are inconsistent and thus full of shit.