Pictures don't molest kids, people do. Also I find it amazing that you don't sympathize with Amanda Todd considering she was extorted for sex pictures by some dude on the internet she sent a picture of her flashing to (after he manipulated her into doing so), and when she refused to send more pictures he spammed her shit all over the internet and then she got picked on so much at school that she killed herself. So your policy is no looking at pictures of naked people below the age of 14, but it is okay to extort people older than that for sexual pictures and then spam them all over the place until they kill themselves? That is so weird because my belief is about the exact opposite, that it is okay to *look* at whatever you want, but it is not okay to manipulate kids into sending you sexual pictures and then blackmailing them with them. Manipulating kids into sending you sexual pictures and then blackmailing them for more = bad Looking at pictures of kids who were manipulated into sending sexual pictures that were posted on the internet = morally neutral Getting pictures of kids who who posted sexual pictures on the internet and then blackmailing them for more = bad Looking at pictures of kids who posted sexual pictures on the internet = morally neutral Note that in the cases I labeled as bad that a victim is inherently created, and that in the cases I labeled as morally neutral that there is not an inherent ability for the previously created victim to become aware of the fact. By the time somebody views such an image on the internet, any potential victim was already created, and barring some quantum entanglement like phenomenon, no further victimization is inherently taking place. Also make note of the fact that it is illegal to extort anybody regardless of their age. It isn't illegal to view or possess child porn in about half of the world. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_regarding_child_pornography That map is somewhat misleading as well, there are some places where it is legal to view child porn if you don't intentionally save it to persistent memory. So viewing and possessing are differentiated in some areas, with viewing legal but not possessing. Also, in some parts of the world where possession and viewing are both illegal, simple possession or viewing are citation/warning/ticket level offenses.