Thus far it has mostly been a debate about if revictimization is real, ie: if child porn being viewed leads to the child depicted being molested all over again, or if viewing child porn is == molesting the child depicted. Considering that a great many criminologists argue for this, and seeing the support the notion has on the forums, I think we must conclude that the majority of people here support the idea that networks of molested children can be used for zero probability of intercept covert channels.