Keep dreaming yourself. How about you look up the official Libertarian party position on child pornography possession? I already know 100% for a fact that the Libertarian party of the USA 100% supports complete legalization of child pornography possession and distribution. http://reason.com/blog/2008/04/23/suffer-the-little-children A prominent libertarian politician straight up resigned from the party when he attacked her for making those claims, due to the massive backlash the party had to him. http://www.thepolitic.com/archives/2008/04/25/libertarian-presidential-front-runner-defends-child-porn/ Liberals are more likely to favor mandatory 'treatment' for those arrested possessing child pornography, where as conservatives of course advocate that they are locked up with the key thrown away. The libertarian position is more liberal than the liberal position, they advocate that distribution of child pornography and possession of child pornography be decriminalized. Can anybody go to prison for taking your picture and using it for anything they want? Not usually. In the majority of cases it would be a civil rather than a criminal matter. In all cases where the person using your image is using it for personal viewing only, it would be a civil rather than a criminal matter. Right now viewing child pornography is a serious felony punishable by up to thirty years in prison, large amounts of financial restitution to the depicted children and a lifetime as a registered sex offender. In a libertarian world, it would either be completely legal to view child pornography, or it would be a civil matter punishable by a fine but not jail time. I am not really hung up on it, it is just the most easily destroyed claim made by those in favor of child pornography possession being criminal. It is so stupid that it makes them look beyond retarded. It is also the original claim I saw made by the prosecutor mentioned in the first part of this article. More sophisticated dumbshits argue the market theory for criminalization, that argument makes a bit more sense in that it is not based on voodoo witchdoctor magic, but of course it is also incorrect. So if somebody is attracted to children and adults, and they get the same sexual satisfaction from child pornography and adult pornography, you think it should be illegal for them to look at adult pornography as well? So pretty much you are just upset about people who have sexual attraction to children being sexually satisfied in any way, regardless of if any children are harmed or not??? My motivation for taking drugs is pleasure. A pedophiles motivation for raping children is pleasure. Since we both have pleasure as our goal/motivation, does that mean that drug use is equal to child molestation? Anybody who illegally views a copy of your book is committing a civil offense not punishable by prison time. The copier is committing a criminal offense, but it isn't anywhere near as bad of a charge as that of distributing child pornography. Your DNA is the property of whoever collects it off public property, if you leave it in public it is public property by current law. You do have some rights to your image and definitely have the right to your thoughts. This is the only libertarian argument that exists against child pornography, it is not an argument that child pornography should be illegal but rather is an argument that child pornography is the property of the children depicted in it. Therefor it should fall under all of the civil and criminal protections of other sorts of property. In such a case mere illegal possession of child pornography for personal use would be punishable by a fine at the worst, and even illegal distribution of child pornography would carry a much less significant potential sentence. So the libertarians who do argue this way are indeed still in favor of decriminalization of child pornography possession and distribution, just with the permission of the property owner. However many libertarian anarchists are against the concept of intellectual property itself, so they would be in favor of complete legalization of the distribution and possession of all child pornography in all cases.