But the thing is that my position is entirely sensitive! It is sensitive to the victims of the war on child pornography. The millions of people every year who are arrested, sent to prison for decades and branded as sex offenders for life simply because they looked at some pictures. People who want child pornography possession to be criminalized are the ones being insensitive to the victims of child pornography. Looking at pictures of somebody being abused actually DOESN'T cause them to be abused again. Some random fuck looking at a picture of an abused child causes approximately 0 measurable damage to the child in the picture. If it causes damage how about we show it in a scientific double blind study? No studies like this exist and if they did they would certainly, beyond any doubt at all, prove that someone viewing a picture of child molestation does not remotely cause measurable harm to the depicted child. Anybody who disagrees with this is arguing something about as believable as the Bible for fucks sake! They have faith that somebody viewing CP damages the depicted children, they will straight up ignore any science regarding the subject.