Ah I see that you were shocked and appalled that I claim revictimization isn't real rather than my claim that CP is a really big number and thus subject to the laws of math. Let me ask you a question. If I download a CP image, and nobody is aware of it (perhaps I use a PIR!), and then I view how the really big number I just downloaded causes the pixels of my screen to color themselves, where exactly is the information transfer between me and the victim portrayed in the image I am viewing? Can you isolate it for me? Or is it more like , I don't know, a soul (something that you have faith exists, but cannot see or prove). If there is no possible information transfer between a person who views CP and a person who is portrayed in the CP, then revictimization stemming from viewing CP is essentially as realistic to me as a soul. The claim that viewing an image of CP causes revictimization, or causes the child to "relive the experience all over again" (people really claim this!! fucking astounding!), is inseparable from voodoo magic. I believe that the people who claim this may have some part of their brain which is underdeveloped, because it seems almost insane to think that the act of viewing a photograph has an effect that is separate from the intrinsic act of viewing the photograph (ie: it causes your brain to intake light, that causes you to perceive an image, and have some emotional response to the image). Really it seems like quite a primitive belief to me, something I would expect of a caveman or perhaps some isolated non-modernized tribe in Africa or some such place. Certainly it is not a belief I would expect someone familiar with photography or modern technology to have!