And now for my promised citations. www.fd.org/pdf_lib/FJC2012/Child_Porn_Dangerousness.pdf by Melissa Hamilton, JD, Ph.D summary: Does not show an offender typology, but is still nice reading for any who wish to be informed. It shows the scientific flaws of various government studies involving CP, points out that the market thesis (jpinkmans argument) has absolutely zero empirical support, explains that teenagers are some of the biggest producers of child porn, traditional organized crime is not involved in child porn, child sex abuse rates have dropped 62% since the internet became mainstream (and CP became available again), child porn offenders and molesters are distinct groups with minor overlap, most CP offenders have large collections of adult porn as well (making them likely pornography addicts and/or sexually indiscriminate rather than pedophiles), technically a large percentage of males have interest in child porn, a popular government study into correlation between child porn possession and sexual contact with minors included sexual contact with minors when CP offender was under age (how honest of them!). Here is a typology from an FBI agent with 30 years of experience. It doesn't say the percentages though. Pornography addicts would likely fall under situational offender type a. here is another info clip from here: http://www.nlada.org/forensics/for_lib/Documents/1170859257.66/nladasubmission.doc (note in particular that it says the frequently do not qualify for pedophilia) .... Well that is all I am going to post for now as I am having trouble to find any solid numbers in regards to the percentages of people arrested for CP crimes who qualify for a diagnosis of pedophilia versus pornography addiction. I know there is a pdf out there with such numbers though, as I recall reading it some years ago. I will continue looking and update this thread if I find it. Still I believe I have demonstrated citations proving that child pornography offenders fall somewhere on a wide typology that includes more than pedophiles, and additionally that they frequently do not qualify for pedophilia (as the last citation I give states).