Of course I am not suggesting this. I am using reduction to absurdity to show why the cookie cutter template from the previous poster is illogical. He attempted to compare me to fascists by saying the following: " Now that we're talking about jews and nazis, the jews did not think they were bad either, but despite this, they were exterminated en masse. The Nazis believed that they had the moral authority to exterminate them, they honestly believed they were creating a better world. Law Enforcement does not think they are bad, but now you want to exterminate them en masse. You believe that you have the moral authority to exterminate them, you honestly believe that by doing so, you will create a better world. See any parallels? " I show that he can not truly believe that this is a logically sound statement, if he disagrees with the following implication that punishing child molesters is equivalent to fascism: " Now that we're talking about jews and nazis, the jews did not think they were bad either, but despite this, they were exterminated en masse. The Nazis believed that they had the moral authority to exterminate them, they honestly believed they were creating a better world. Child Molesters do not think they are bad, but now you want to [punish/execute] them en masse. You believe that you have the moral authority to [punish/execute] them, you honestly believe that by doing so, you will create a better world. See any parallels? "