I still think vendors selling software sets a precedent that we need to be careful about. A lot of good can come from having programmers working to make software to help us become more secure and make our lives easier. In fact, I have some projects of my own that I am working on. At the same time we need to realize that the people here are of course risking very real prison sentences, and that the utmost care must be taken regarding running software from people. I think that the best approach is one of open source publicly audited only. If a vendor knows enough python to audit the code they will make it themselves, so there is no point in anyone who is capable of auditing it paying for it. I don't think that we should have a culture here that promotes haphazardly running code from others, that will certainly lead to people being pwnt and I can very easily see Pines concern, although I also see that she is somewhat fear mongering or at least talking about technical things she doesn't know enough about to make accusations based on (for example claiming a python program is closed source, I don't know if that is even possible, maybe it can be distributed as bytecode or obfuscated, but that is hardly what anyone thinks of when python scripts are mentioned, and it seems she has absolutely nothing to base her claims of this software not being open source on). My suggestion remains, that people not use software offered by people here, unless it is open source and the code is available for everyone here to audit. I think this is the only way we can create tools for each other to use while not being at risk of malicious activity. I would love to make money from the tools I will hopefully be providing soon, but I realize that nobody in their right mind is going to run code from here unless it is publicly audited, and the people who do are going to end up getting pwnt, be it from Louise or someone else.