Every time you open a tab with images you are storing those images in at least your computers volatile memory, most likely traces of them are left on your hard drive as well. The simple fact of the matter is that what you did is not at all different from what a very substantial number of people arrested with CP did to get busted, they saw some fucked up sounding file names on limewire downloaded a few of them out of curiosity, deleted them and then six months later were raided and forensics people recovered the deleted images. The only real difference between you and them is the fact that you used Tor so you will not be raided or have your computer analyzed. When you call for fucked up things to happen to these people, you are calling for fucked up things to happen to yourself. Why do you think it is okay for you to load pedo sites once and admit to your mistake but if someone else does it you literally want their balls? So fucking hypocritical. Opening a pedo site once on the clearnet to see a sad faced child with a penis coming toward him/her will end up with you being ass fucked by Bubba, and you seem to be very happy about this for some reason. I am left to conclude that your secret fantasy is not pedophilia but rather being raped in the ass in prison. Further, as I already said, you can not reasonably claim that an action is bad or good based on the emotional state it creates in the person committing it. Law enforcement are allowed to browse and trade in CP to bust other people browsing and trading in CP, but I can't recall a law enforcement operation where they molested children to bust other people molesting children. The idea that someone can have an immoral or illegal emotion is fucking absurd, and I immediately write off anyone who thinks this way as being mentally defective. Solely *actions* can be immoral (ie: murder is immoral as an action, not enjoying murdering someone does not make it moral) and solely *actions* should be illegal, and morality and legality should be *universal*. It is insanity to argue that if an action should be considered illegal or not should rely on the emotional state created in the person committing the action.