This tends to be the case on darknets (although not so much on clearnet, especially if you go to 4chan), which is why it is so funny to see people who say they have been to CP sites on Tor/I2P/Freenet bitching about other people going to CP sites on Tor/I2P/Freenet. But OMGZ of course it is a special case for them, because they didn't jack off to it and it was only that one time and only for a minute and they only clicked a few links and and and fuck you kmfkewm you are a dirty pedophile and I hope all pedophiles like you die a painful death and burn in hell! These people would be quick to condemn someone to death for doing exactly what they did, if the someone else were ever to be busted and a nice news article posted along the lines of "Pedophile busted visiting CP site on Tor!", and they would laugh at his claims of not jacking off, only doing it one time, etc and call for him to be castrated and shot in the back of the head. Scary as it is to think that humans would want to do that to someone for looking at a picture, the more scary thing is that they can not see themselves in that situation when the only thing preventing it from happening to them is the network that they are condemning for supporting pedophiles. Here is a little hint. If you think "looking at CP is bad and should be illegal" and "child molestation is bad and should be illegal" and also think saying "I went to a CP site, but only once, and I only clicked a few links, and I didn't jack off or enjoy it, and it was only for a minute before I got the fuck out of there!" makes the action of looking at CP morally justifiable, but saying "I molested a child, but only once, and I only touched them a few times, and I didn't cum or enjoy it, and it was only for a minute before I got the fuck out of there!" doesn't make molestation morally justifiable, then maybe you need to reconsider some of your positions (I will let you pick!), because there appears to be some inconsistency in your sense of morality.