I think if you are going to argue that meth and weed are equally addictive that sane people can just ignore you from that point on. And yeah my info is entirely ancedotal re; meth versus amphetamine, but all of the people arguing for meth being no worse than amphetamine are using entirely ancedotal evidence too. The effects of meth and amphetamine I could tell apart any day, then again I never smoked amphetamine lol. Meth fucking ruins people, I really just don't see amphetamine as being anywhere near as bad. If you can use meth regularly and be fine great for you but ime you are not in the majority , but I don't see people who use amphetamine regularly getting anywhere as near fucked up as meth users do. The point is simply that small changes to a chemical structure can cause insanely different effects. You really have no room to call people stupid if you think weed and meth are equally addictive. Really I think the only people who would think that, must be addicted to meth and in major denial. Use whatever the fuck you want and if it works for you great, I have nothing against meth users. I have something against people minimizing the harms of meth to justify their own behavior though. Saying meth and weed are equally addictive is just delusional.