I actually said that if you subtract the (positive) difference between my IQ and average from an average IQ that the resulting IQ would be mentally retarded, and pointed out that you obviously are not (any helpful sort of...) autistic since you couldn't even keep in your memory something that you had just previously said (the attack being advanced), but I decided that it was kind of mean (and entirely pointless) so I deleted it.
Anyway sorry for trying to be helpful, hope that your cognitive dissonance keeps you feeling safe, hopefully people who are not retarded can understand this attack and how simple it is to implement, an take the proper counter measures. I will read your last reply later have better shit to do right now. These academic research papers are not going to read themselves
.
edit: ah fuck it I can't help but respond to your retardation.
sometimes even in the intelligence community.
I talk with people in the intelligence community on a regular basis
What would happen when the New York Post finds out the USPS and the FBI are working together to profile every piece of mail being sent in this country, for the purposes of prosecuting misdemeanors?
Getting drugs in the mail is generally a felony. Actually, since it is always a federal crime I think it is always a felony. Hm, seems a felony is anything punishable by one year or more in prison. Hm the least scheduled drugs are punishable by up to one year in prison for getting them in the mail, so it is even a felony to get them via mail. Of course if they decide to prosecute or not is entirely up to them, and you are probably going to get a love letter for Xanax (although on the books you can get up to five years in prison for getting a single xanax tab shipped to you). Still you are retarded if you think getting drugs via mail is a misdemeanor offence. And my guess is if that does happen, people will cheer the law enforcement community and say if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about, that seems to be the general theme.
There are local police agencies in USA using lisence plate scanners that keep real time positioning logs of all vehicles in certain cities for traffic analysis. Local police use logs from these to locate burglary suspects (via crowd intersection attacks!!!), find stolen cars, etc. I don't see people throwing fits about this, or even being aware about it in general, despite the fact that it has been reported on to a limited extent. Of course in your mind....this is technology that local police would never use for finding small time criminals. Because you participate in cognitive dissonance to make yourself feel safer than you are.
Ok, now that I know what I'm dealing with, and understand that to you, winning the argument is more important than being in line with reality, I realize that debating with you is pointless. So I'offer a few more words, but I really don't want to get into a TLDR back and forth with you.
Shit don't tell me to not put words in your mouth if you are going to take them out of my head!
We're talking right past each other. You're describing theories, I'm describing reality. You work with computers all day. I work with people, often law enforcement and other government officials, sometimes even in the intelligence community. I know how to read people, and I listen. Two very important skills in my line of work.
I am describing....attack scenarios? You are describing....a bunch of bullshit? I am sure you are a great politician
You seemingly have no understanding of jurisdiction, or of how little information is properly shared between government entities. And given how much case law you seem to research, it blows my mind that you haven't noticed how unsophisticated the "attacks" were in uncovering people who have been busted receiving narcotics in the mail (and how few of them involved USPS compared to private delivery, etc). You also haven't demonstrated that the postal service will do anything other than confiscate and destroy small amounts, and in fact the opposite seems to be the case (that the policy for small amounts is confiscation and destruction).
Pretty sure that feds have full jurisdiction over the entire country.....I am fully aware that jurisdictional issues are a major hurdle that LE have tremendous trouble to overcome, but in many cases they are starting to overcome these hurdles. Plus feds are feds. Most of the attacks say that an interception happened, but not how the interception happened. They try to keep intelligence gathering methods pretty low key so people don't try to counter them. For schedule IV and V drugs confiscation of small amounts generally doesn't lead to anything more than a love letter, but for schedule I drugs you can generally expect to get fuxxed. Anyway show me any proof that it is their standard procedure to destroy personal use amounts of drugs. Like I said I missed the memo legalized personal use amounts of all recreational drugs in USA that you seem to have gotten.
Clearly you don't understand how the system works. Us powerful white people like to have our drugs. However, we have to pander to the powerful white people who don't like drugs, so we arrest minorities who do stupid shit and get busted. Whenever a powerful white person gets busted for drugs, it's because he screwed with the wrong person, not because the postal service is doing intersection attacks. If we find out somebody is starting to go after affluent white people who discretely get their drugs and commit no other crimes, you can be damn sure that effort will mysteriously go away. Get it?
Why are so many of my affluent white friends going to prison for small drug charges then? Is it because they didn't get them shipped via the mail (which makes it a more serious crime)?
Show Posts
). I smoked meth 12 times and still get strong cravings for it 7 years later.