Silk Road forums

you could try running heidi eraser and setting it to wipe free space , but you are most likely fucked on data destruction unless you wipe the entire drive with ATA secure erase

I would think that if Liberte has DNS leaks that it should be pretty trivial to determine this with Wireshark? The Tor people don't much care for Liberte and suggest Tails, but Tails is pretty much an anonymity death trap if you don't take care to keep persistent entry guards.

Quote from: HeyOItsMe2 on April 24, 2012, 09:33 am

Quote from: N2DEEP on April 24, 2012, 08:56 am

x>16 when y<26
x=y+10 when y> or = 26

Guess that works....but looking at 16 and 26 I think Im a bit more comfortable with...

1/2 your age +7 (a commonly referenced social equation)
(x-7)*2=y

Love the way you express them as formals. and agree totally agree with your sentiments.


I know what you mean. While in an upper level college Calculus class, I started hitting on a girl who I thought was like 19 or 20, but found out she was only 15 and just super smart for her age. It made me feel like a total prev. and couldn't even look at her for the rest of the semester.

Im glad someone enjoyed my math
You were in a situation where all the contextual clues said she was an eligible mate. If her appearance says 19-20 and intellectually she was obviously advanced beyond her years.....
youve really no reason to feel like a perv...Just order her a fake ID for plausible deniability j/k

My listing of US age of consent figures, with 31 states approving of 16 year olds,  shows that the powers that be even acknowledge a serious difference between Pedophelia (0-10),  Hebephelia (11-14), and Ephebophelia (15-19).

Quote from: kmfkewm on April 24, 2012, 11:06 am

my theory is that most people here are in their late teens to mid 20s , and people in this age range tend to be okay with going significantly younger than people who are older, who largely seem to be rabidly fixated on 18+

Rabidly fixated....not so sure...culturally indoctrinated perhaps...experienced enough to realize the risks....established enough in our lives to have something real to lose. And additionally, at some point, some of us have daughters of our own....the first time I dated a woman closer in age to my kid then myself it gave me a moment of pause.

As for your demographic assumptions I think youd be surprised at how many older people are here. While I am aware there are quite a few youngsters, as their presence is more obvious due to their lack of discretion, younger enthusiasts of altered states are quite often well networked in the actual world, able to find dealers, and less able to discretely accept packages. and quite often financially less able to indulge in larger purchases when the "quick deal" arrives.

 There are quite a few older members that read an article somewhere....and came here because often times.... As the years pass our lives progress, the risk of losing it all becomes more significant.........we not only loose those connections that in our youth provided us with the tools of our intoxications but also the desire to have connections to them anymore.  SR makes it far easier to find what we desire discreetly.

Almost always when I hear people going batshit about the thought of sex with anyone under 18, they are in their 40s+ (or females), where as I find it quite common for (males) in their teens and twenties to be fairly open about not giving much of a shit (or even endorsing the idea ). I haven't held a scientific study or anything though. Also there are probably quite a few older folk here, but there was a poll that showed late teens to mid twenties as the most common age range, and I think this would hold true even if everyone here voted honestly on the poll. Internet drug scene is dominated by this age range, and it makes sense, its the generation that grew up on the internet and its the age range where people use drugs the most.

I do agree that it is cultural indoctrination though, I think this is also reflected in age groups as it seems to me younger people are less influenced by traditional sorts of indoctrination. This can be seen by looking at statistics for drug legalization, the older the group the more they are in favor of criminalization (% wise), and the younger the group the more people are in favor of decriminalization (% wise). There is probably more to it than that though, but it is an observation I have made. Perhaps the fact that younger people are the internet generation comes into play in a serious way, older folk didn't have access to so much information and got most of their information from localized sources and also through traditional media and government channels. It might not be strange to someone to think that 18+ is absolute moral truth if that is what the "authority" figures in their area say, what they see on television and what their friends say they also believe. But it quickly reduces to absurdity when you regularly talk with people from countries with age of consent ranging from 14 to 21, and see that people in some places are being labeled as vicious sexual predators for doing things that are perfectly legal in the country of the normal person you talk to regularly, who lives a thousand miles away from you (or even just a stones throw away).

Also when you communicate with your local friends you will be much less likely to be bluntly honest about your beliefs, versus talking on the internet, which most perceive as anonymous even without taking any measures. Interacting with 'the masses' online probably gives a better view of what the masses truly believe, versus interacting with them in meat space. Of course this may not be the case anymore now that government is flooding pseudonyms into every nook and cranny of the internet (using fairly sophisticated software at that!) to distort the perception of public opinion (they are starting to become more modernized with their propaganda, but it did take them a while to catch up, as always)

I love how out of 20 votes only 10% say 18+

not so much

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_scale

of course as with drugs, everyone is different

Tor cloud is for adding cheap bridges to the network

BHN is a soverign citizen apparently. They are a very strange breed of people, who think that they know the real law and that all the police and judges have it wrong. They think that their perception of the law is in any way tied to reality, so must be fairly delusional. I do give them props though, they have killed enough law enforcement officers to be classified as a domestic terror threat.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-18560_162-20062666.html

I actually am highly sympathetic to their cause, the main difference between me and them is that I don't think there is a secret version of the law, and have not become preoccupied with holding mock trials and 'convicting' judges/police officers. There are probably some other differences too. They are very close to libertarian / anarchist and can often be found in the same circles, however they have become obsessive compulsive in regards to certain beliefs that have no real ties to reality, and that nobody really cares about except them (ie: ranting on about how the law "really is" to exhaustive detail, despite all indications showing that they are completely incorrect) 

Anarchists / Libertarians: Think that taxation is morally wrong and don't like it
Sovereign Citizens: Think that taxation is actually illegal under the real law and that they will not get arrested if they don't pay it provided they follow the procedures in their made up laws that they think are real

Anarchists / Libertarians: Think that things like the roads and drivers licenses should be handled by the free market, not the government 
Sovereign Citizens: Think that it is not illegal for them to drive without a license under the real law, and sometimes shoot police officers when they are pulled over

I think most of them also believe that the federal government owes everyone a hundred thousand dollars or something like that and keeps it hidden in a secret bank from us because they don't want to pay up.

etc etc. Sovereign citizens take libertarianism and anarchy to their insane extremes (which doesn't mean that they are radical anarchists or libertarians, but means that they are insane people with libertarian and anarchist beliefs. The reason they are insane is because they both think and act like we live in an anarchist society, so they think doing things like shooting police, will not get them arrested, because if the police arrest them for say drug possession, they are convinced that this is actually kidnapping UNDER THE LAW instead of just in reality) 

Echelon is a real system but it is outdated, they use Narusinsight supercomputers for most of their stuff now.