Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kmfkewm

Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 249
2911
Every vendor that has been arrested for selling illicit substances online used a PO box. The police watched the person go in and physically get the mail.

PO Boxes are not very safe, but they are more reliable so there is a higher chance your mail will come. Also, it is just you and your mail so no issues with a relative/neighbor fucking with your mail.

If you're paranoid you'll need a physical proxy to get your mail. Either mail to their address, or have them go and get the mail from your PO box. I take this route, but being a vendor I have a reason to be excessively paranoid.

What about all of the vendors who used fake ID boxes and didn't get busted because of it? One vendor who had 5 grams of crystal LSD seized and didn't go in to pick it up because the tracking said "Held by non-customs federal agency" comes to mind. He called from a burner phone from a random location to inquire about the status of his package, and they kindly informed him that they wanted to question him about a baggie of material that was discovered in his package. Another also comes to mind where hundreds of sheets to multiple people resulted in raids, and since everyone else who participated in that order got raided he decided not to go to his box to pick up his package. What about all the people who drop their boxes after they find out one of the people who they get shit from was arrested, making it so they don't give a fuck if the person gives shipping info to the feds. What about the fact that its harder for LE to put a bunch of fake ID box locations under constant manned surveillance than it is for them to log all of the addresses on outgoing mail from a vendor they put under surveillance. What about the fact that there is technically nothing stopping you from having vendors use broadcasting interception detection technology to alert you if your package has been opened in transit. What about the fact that they sign for the package for you ? What about the fact that if some asshole you order from decides to blackmail you with your address or spam your address, you can just drop the box and get another one? What about etc etc etc. Fake ID private mail boxes are the clear winner, but try to use in state ID if you can.

2912
Security / Re: The final step in the block chain?
« on: May 04, 2012, 05:39 am »
Step One: Use a mix so the coins can't be tied to any specific drug deal by the time you cash them out

Step Two: Use anonymous ATM cards to cash them out so you don't need to explain the $100,000's that just landed in your bank account. I am pretty sure some of the cards can cash out $1,000 a day so get 100 of them and you could technically cash out 100k in a day :P, one vendor I know has like 8 of them all anonymous so thats ~$56,000 a week in cash out potential with none of it tied to a IRL identity other than the fake / stolen ones used to obtain the cards.

Another option is mix + cash out to western union and pick up with a fake ID

Another option is mix + cash out to another E-currency like pecunix or LR, lots of exchangers for those will cash out to WU for you plus it adds another layer of obfuscation. I still have yet to hear of anyone who uses pecunix + offshore exchangers being traced via a financial trail , it isn't bulletproof by any means but it is still a lot better than paypal, the pigs will need to get records from pecunix + records from the exchanger and that usually involves two different international jurisdictions. Pick the exchangers wire up with a fake ID and it makes it all the harder, now it takes three international jurisdictions and they will end up at a dead end with nothing but CCTV footage if they are lucky.
 
There are two distinct goals, the first is to avoid being traced via a financial trail. Correctly implemented and heavily used mixes do an excellent job of achieving this, better than anything else, especially blind mixes. The second goal is to avoid having unaccounted for money showing up under your name, and risking money laundering charges by being tied to a mix. This can be achieved in a few ways, anonymous ATM cards, anonymous / fake ID wire pick ups , layering traditional E-currency accounts / exchangers in between your bank account and the mix (less secure than the other options but better than nothing, also only good for hiding that you used a mixing service not from hiding that you obtained money) etc. 

Doing either of these things is good and some of them actually help achieve both goals (for example, cashing out with an anonymous ATM will help avoid you being traced through financial trails and it also hides that you obtained money, even if you don't use a mix or anything else), but using both sorts of technique together means you are golden.

What you don't want to be doing is cashing in via a bank account under your own name, using your real IP address at the exchanger, and then sending the bitcoins right to a vendor without mixing them. You also don't want to be taking your coins from SR and then with your real IP address making a deal with an exchanger to get money in your real bank account for them. Doing that is hardly better than using Paypal, although as long as you bounce Bitcoins around a few accounts that are not linked on the network layer you should obtain plausible deniability in an evidence context, but that does fuck all at preventing intelligence from indicating your involvement.

2913
Security / Re: The "Knock"
« on: May 04, 2012, 05:24 am »
Most prosecutors have 90% conviction rates because they charge you with something that carries up to twenty five years in prison if a jury convicts you, and then they offer to lower it to something you will get probation for if you plead guilty. Judges are not bound by plea agreements, but they usually do follow through on them. Most people just are not going to risk a jury finding them guilty and getting a sentence that is twenty times worse than what they can plea bargain for, even if the original charges are trumped up. They always try to get people to plea guilty even for serious cases, go to jury you risk death penalty plea guilty get life, go to jury and get life in a shitty prison plea guilty and get eighty years in a less shitty prison etc.

The prosecutor will almost always give you trumped up charges and then plea bargain you down to ensure a conviction.

2914
That sucks if it is the case. You need to find a way to be anonymous when you buy and sell bitcoins. There is absolutely no point in using anonymous cash in methods if you connect to the exchanger from your real IP address. Buy a private VPS anonymously and connect to it via Tor, then use the VPS for exchanger stuff. Or find an exchanger that doesn't lock accounts that they see proxies connecting to. At the very least use open WiFi from a random location when dealing with them.
Yeah, but than you transfer the funds to a bank account under your name, ID, social security and everything?

I would cash out with an ATM card obtained with fake documentation / stolen identities if required, and shipped to a location that I can not be tied to (or to someone I trust to destroy their copy after transferring it to me, and then have them message me an encrypted copy of the magstrip data so I could encode it to a blank card and never have to physically pick anything up). I would also cash in anonymously, I hear there are IRC channels where people offer bitcoins for cash in the mail and such. At the very worst I would try to find a western union accepting exchanger and send with no ID or fake ID. Or maybe I would buy some greendot recharge packs and offer them for bitcoin. There are a lot of options, and they all have different levels of anonymity, but I can assure you that I would not cash in or out through a bank account under my real name. I don't care if it is absolutely legal to buy and sell bitcoins, or not, I care if I will be linked to a drug deal or at risk of being charged with money laundering if I use a mix.  Not to mention none of the mixing services are using blind mixing algorithms so the anonymity they can provide against the mix operator is zero.

2915
Security / Re: The "Knock"
« on: May 04, 2012, 02:53 am »
Technically they could completely ass rape you for ordering even a single bud of weed. You could be charged for money laundering, being a participant in a continuing criminal enterprise, trafficking drugs over state lines or importing drugs, conspiracy, obstruction of justice (a charge they like to throw at people who use encryption and anonymizers to avoid investigative efforts) and probably a dozen other charges, locked up and have the key thrown away. That said they are very unlikely to actually do this to people who are ordering personal use amounts, but legally nothing is preventing them from doing it, and who knows if the jury will nullify considering technically you will have broken all of those laws. It is far more likely that you will be charged by the state (not feds) with something close to equal to what you would be if you were found with those drugs after being pulled over, which could be anything from in or out patient drug rehab to a few months in jail or years in prison (which will be mostly spent on parole) for personal use amounts, depending on where exactly you live.

People who are ordering larger than clearly personal use amounts (for example ordering sheets of acid or ounces of MDMA) are more likely to be charged with more serious offenses like drug trafficking and will likely be sentenced to several years in prison (with most on parole) instead of jail or rehab.

People who are shipping product will almost certainly spend at least a few years in federal prison (which has no parole), and the significant vendors and organizers will probably be hit with all of the nasty charges from above and die in prison.

They will likely charge you with slightly more serious crimes than they think they stand a strong chance of convicting you on, because they want you to plea guilty to lesser charges and they know you will not risk the chance that a jury will convict you on trumped up charges. So even if they charge you with drug trafficking for getting a bud in the mail, they will probably immediately offer you a plea bargain where you are charged with simple possession if you agree to plea guilty. The plea bargain they offer you will largely depend on how much money you have spent on a lawyer.

2916
Security / Re: Tor Browser Bundle Security Leak
« on: May 04, 2012, 12:31 am »
Isolation of web browser FTW. Prevents all potential leaks. I can run flash , java, javascript, use applications that leak DNS in fifty different ways and be rooted and the attacker still can not get my real IP (although of course I don't do such dangerous things, at least there is a strong layer of protection even in worst case scenarios)

2917
Silk Road discussion / Re: If prohibition is lifted
« on: May 04, 2012, 12:26 am »
Just what America needs; privatized police and security forces to go along with it's privatized prisons and miltary industrial complex.

Prisons are privatized in a sense, but they collude with the government to get all of their customers.

2918
Welcome to the difference between evidence and intelligence. IP address has very rarely ever been used as evidence, but it is still enough to get a search warrant (during which time evidence will be collected), and it is still enough to get you put under surveillance. This precedent has already largely been followed in CP investigations, people who are raided based on IP address *intelligence* (ie: every single person busted with CP) almost always have charges dropped if no CP is recovered during the raid, but it has already also been established that an IP address *is enough probable cause for a search warrant* and nobody is going to get out of charges if additional evidence is found after they are raided / put under surveillance after they are identified by their IP address.

"But the only reason they knew I was mailing heroin is because they put me under surveillance after they found my IP address!" is not going to fly.

"But the only evidence they have that I am the one who sent them heroin is that they traced their communications with the person they made a heroin deal with back to me!" has essentially never been enough to get a conviction in court and usually the judge throws out cases where a traced IP address is the *only* evidence

2919
Off topic / Re: Some lessons from The Farmers Market
« on: May 03, 2012, 07:45 am »
A non-stupid-fuck snitch facing long hard time will not even talk to cops. They negotiate with the prosecutors through their attorneys. Snitching pays if the benefit of the information the prosecutors can use is greater than what they get out of prosecuting you. Then theres the Witness Protection Program, new identities, new credit, new job, new house, new cars/trucks, new life... etc. Some are even paid handsomely for their snitching. I do not advocate snitching, but no one knows what they will do until they are arrested, in prison, and facing investigators, prosecutors, and decades of cold hard time. Fact remains, the majority snitches. The point I am driving home is to take precautions so its never an issue to begin with.

We should round them all up and kill them as well , during the great LE purge of 2012

2920
Off topic / Re: Tor BadNodes, last update March 10?
« on: May 03, 2012, 07:17 am »
you shouldn't use this list, let Tor pick nodes for you, they already mark bad nodes at the authority servers and your client will not select nodes with the 'bad' flag.

2921
Security / Re: LEO Threats/warnings
« on: May 03, 2012, 06:44 am »
Indictment was probably from then, people are often indicted quite a while before they are raided and the indictment is then released after those indicted are in custody

People facing federal charges are frequently indicted months or years before they are raided and arrested, but after they arrest everyone its generally public knowledge immediately.

2922
should be safe to use tor browser and non tor browser at same time, only risk is if you use both to access the same site with tor and without tor at the same time, your internet could die and that will leave a correlation that could deanonymize you.

2923
Security / Re: LEO Threats/warnings
« on: May 03, 2012, 06:05 am »
TFM was not busted in september 2011 and we heard about it pretty much the same day the arrests were made

2924
Silk Road discussion / Re: If prohibition is lifted
« on: May 03, 2012, 05:44 am »
But what happens in such a society when some person or some group unjustly impinges on the rights of some other person or group?  What if the latter is the weaker?  Are they just fucked?

Okay, I think I partially answered my own question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispute_resolution_organization

What about weapons of mass destruction, such as nukes?  Surely society needs the state to (hopefully) minimize their use, no?

Private defense agencies will limit the ability of those they think would use nuclear weapons against their customers, to both obtain and use nuclear weapons. Every single thing the state does can be privatized. What about them do you find so magic that allows them to do things that other groups of people can not do?

It's not that I think there's any magic involved.  But I do think one has to ask/think about what the world would look like if nuclear weapons were in control of one or more corporations, as you so nonchalantly are suggesting.  I'm not sure I'm completely comfortable with the "they won't kill me because I'm their customer" theory.

The government is a corporation that makes its money from extortion murder and enslavement, I would much rather a company that profits from defending customers has control over nuclear weapons.

2925
Security / Re: Jacob Appelbaum on Tor and GPAs
« on: May 03, 2012, 05:15 am »
And I also should apologize for jumping to conclusions :)

Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 249