Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The Republicans are notorious for striping any personal freedoms, and they will do it in the name of SECURITY or CHRISTIANITY. So they think that we need more taxes and harder laws to govern the population but less regulation and taxes on businesses. I vote democratically but I also understand that all of our politicians are bought and paid for by the 1%.
If your other packages show up, don't sign for anything, write "return to sender" on them, and pray to Jesus Malverde.
The return to sender thing was a joke, it's not a real legal defense. It would only work if the letter wasn't in your name or the name of anyone living at that address or even nearby.
The court simply won't believe that you got a letter in your name, didn't open it to check inside and wrote return to sender on it, then left it lying around not returned to sender. From a legal perspective it just makes things look worse, not better, you're giving them more evidence.
I would never use my real name on an order for Schedule I drugs. Fuck that. I really don't give a fuck if a vendor wants me to. Not doing it. But hey, that's just me. You want to order Schedule I drugs in your real name to your real address, go right ahead.
I get shit in my mailbox every day with names of people who don't live here. Every fucking day. And I have no control over it. It just happens. So it's totally believable/plausible when I write "return to sender" on an envelope that I had nothing to do with it.
BTW, if it came down to it, it's not up to "the court". It's up to a jury of peers.
Passing on good karma as well but I actually haven't smoked in a month now. Although I should probably stop doing acid everydayIt only lasts for a couple hours and I keep redosing. Should I flush it down the toilet? How long do you guys think it'll take my brain to reach homeostasis seratonin and dopamine wise?
I feel like this so much man. like where did i go wrong in life, but perhaps its what we've done right?
But then why do I feel socially criminal or insane when it's really their blissful ignorance that carries the problem?
Gee. Thanks for helping restore some calm into this scary situation ass-hole.QuoteI am still expecting domestic/international orders in the mail!!! What the fuck should I do here!!! HELP!!!
OH BOY YOU'RE FUCKING FUCKED!!!!!
FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOURE FUCKING FUCKED MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF YOU WAITING FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ITS SMUGGLING YOU CAN NOT SAY ITS NOT FOR YOU IF THEY ALREADY FOUND SOMETHING!!!!!!!!!!
YOU SHOULD ADMIT EVERYTHING TO GET A BETTER DEAL!!! JUST SAY THEM YOU GOT IT FROM SILKROAD SAY FROM WHICH VENDOR THEY CAN NOT DO ANYTHING!!!!! BUT YOU WILL GET LESS PENALTY!!!!!!!
I know I am fucked here...but that doesn't help.
Are there any decent/experienced folks out there who can help with CALM REASONED MATURE advice???
PLEASE???
Should I remove my lap top from my premises if I haven't data scrubbed it? Thanks.
Ruby people fucked off, Java people fucked off, I have come to the conclusion that you can trust anonymous people on the internet with money for drugs and you will receive them, but if you pay someone for code they will fuck off.this reminded me that there's also a (small) group of people mostly from public scene doing paid work on the interception detection stuff that bk talked about. it uses gsm now instead of rfid, so you don't even have to go near your po box. would you like to join us?
Ruby people fucked off, Java people fucked off, I have come to the conclusion that you can trust anonymous people on the internet with money for drugs and you will receive them, but if you pay someone for code they will fuck off.
Hopefully scalability would be a problem, fifty people mixing messages together does not lead to much security. If a system is as point and click easy as a php forum and offers anonymity and security better than Tor or GPG, I would imagine it would be used by a decent number of people. Especially since there are so many people who are always complaining about how much a pita it is to use GPG. Those people would love to double click on an icon, have a program that looks nearly identical to a phpbb forum pop up, click on the pseudonyms/groups of their desired message recipient(s), type their message in, press the nice looking send button, and not have to know how to do anything else. People who know how to use GPG will like this as well, although may be more attracted by elliptic curve crypto offering nearly double the strength of RSA 4,096, or by provably secure mixing to protect them from end point timing correlation attacks, or padding to protect them from fingerprinting attacks.
I do know some about security, particularly traffic analysis, but I have thus far focused far more on learning theory (such as what the types of attacks and defenses are, how they work, etc) than the skills to implement such a system (of attacks or defenses) with any language. The bulk of my "applicable" security knowledge is related to operating system hardening and server administration. However now I am focusing much more on learning implementation skills, and I am pretty satisfied with my theoretical knowledge (especially of traffic analysis, when it comes to crypto I know more than most but less than most who try to learn much about crypto)
The problem, from my perspective, is not so much about technology as it is about people. The weakest link in any security system is the end-user. If you're dealing with unsophisticated end-users.... Like the old saying goes: "Build an idiot-proof system, and nature will come up with a better idiot."
I'm old enough to remember the crypto wars of the 1990s. Then FBI-Director Louis Freeh was crying to all and sundry that the end of the world was nigh. Criminals would soon be using robust crypto, and without a backdoor law enforcement investigations would simply grind to a halt.
The Cypherpunks, for their part, believed that the public would adopt crypto en-masse -- their unofficial (unspoken) motto was, "Build it and they will come."
Both of them were wrong, and for the very same reason -- both camps did not account for human nature, in particular, end-user sloth. In the case of the operators of The Farmers' Market, I have read comments by people who knew them in real life, and they stated that they were told repeatedly what they were doing wasn't safe. Doing things properly would likely have taken them outside their comfort zone, and they preferred to stay with what they were comfortable with. You'll see the same thing on here, with people asking: "Do I really have to learn to use GPG?"
The FBI found that criminals were not adopting strong crypto, for the most part, as it was hard to use. The Cypherpunks found that the general public were not embracing crypto for the same reason. Furthermore, in general, the public simply did not (and goes not) perceive a need for it. They simply rationalize that the state would never be interested in them or their activities. You'll even see such sentiments expressed here -- the government isn't interested in small time buyers/dealers.
Frankly, very few people have the knowledge (nevermind the discipline) to use the tools appropriately. As you said, people just want to be able to click on a button, and not have to think about what they are doing. You make a system for these types of people, and you end up with something like Hushmail.
Guru
)
) ... (not mentioning Guru, who may be a professional cryptographer for all I know). I am not convinced that anyone in the drug scene has the skills required to make such designs, myself included, and any attempts to do so may very well end up being counter productive and giving a false sense of security when in fact they could harm security. Furthermore, it is not at all smart to have security software made by illegal groups specifically for protecting illegal activity from law enforcement, merely using such software would cast strong suspicion on any users. Also, only criminals will audit it, and as I said before I am not convinced that the drug scene has the talent required to audit or create such a product in the first place, multiple attempts have failed and a lot of money and time has been wasted. Also, only criminals will use it and that is simply not secure, especially in contexts where security directly correlates with crowd sizes and diversity of crowd sizes. ) 
