Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kmfkewm

Pages: 1 ... 154 155 [156] 157 158 ... 249
2326
Off topic / Re: SR is the least of our Troubles
« on: August 17, 2012, 03:29 am »
The only naked pics of kids that should exist are baby pics, like the cute ones when you're in the sink or in the tub not in some photo studio smiling with a watermark on the bottom, that's just sick and morally wrong and you all know it. More importantly, these pictures are taken for one purpose and one purpose only, to view them in a perverted way. I do believe in pedophiles, the real pedophiles, you know the people that actually love children but don't molest them.

Sure it is sick and morally wrong to put a child in such a position. It is sick and morally wrong to exterminate the Jews as well. It is not sick and morally wrong to look at the resulting pictures anymore than it is sick or morally wrong to look at the images of the holocaust. It is a strange and magical belief to think that the morality of the person who caused a picture to exist, is passed to the people who view the pictures. If you actually really believed that you would think yourself guilty of war crimes for having seen pictures of the results. The only way you can see that as less than a perfect analogy is by shutting down the part of your brain that deals with reason.

2327
Off topic / Re: SR is the least of our Troubles
« on: August 17, 2012, 03:26 am »
Be interesting to see what you thought if your children were molested Kmf, what would you say then? Would you be happy for the videos and/or images of Kmf Jnr being violated being thrown around the web for any sick fuck to jack off to? I'm not sure you'd be dancing to the same rhythm then or then again maybe there would be other reasons for this. Who knows?

I would certainly be a lot more angry at the person who molested my child, than at the people who saw pictures of it afterwards. Their act of seeing pictures makes my child no more or less molested , in fact it is not possible for it to have any additional effect on the child that was not caused already by the molester taking the pictures/videos and releasing them to the internet in the first place, unless the child takes an interest in being notified every time someone downloads a picture or video of them.

2328
Off topic / Re: SR is the least of our Troubles
« on: August 17, 2012, 03:03 am »
I do not think pictures of anything should be illegal to view. I of course think it should be illegal to molest children or to murder people etc. If looking at pictures causes you bad emotions I suggest that you make the personal choice of avoiding to look at those pictures, and give others the right to make their own choices. As long as your actions do not directly hurt another person then they should not be outlawed, and the only way that looking at a picture hurts a person is through some magic process called revictimization. You may as well try to convince me that it should be illegal to pray for bad things to happen to someone as it seems about as absurd to me as making it illegal to look at pictures of bad things happening to someone. DOING bad things to people should be illegal, you are not doing anything to someone by looking at a picture...for the picture to have been taken bad things must have already BEEN DONE.

Quote
1 good thing about the yank gov they do actually track there rich pedos in cambodia etc and get them proper time not pay a bribe and of u go,the other govs dont there was a program about it and a guy worth 50 mil from florida got tracked and niked in asia noncing kids  and got a proper sentance

Yes that is fine and dandy I hope that they catch them all and send them to jail! But it is absolutely fucking insane to think that looking at the pictures produced by someone who goes to Cambodia and molests children, is just as bad as going to Cambodia to molest children! Molesting anyone is bad! Looking at any picture is not bad! There are not exceptions to be made in these cases, the world is really a very black and white place.

2329
Off topic / Re: SR is the least of our Troubles
« on: August 17, 2012, 02:09 am »
It is kind of pointless really, the people who argue that it should not be illegal to view CP present rational arguments, scientific studies and make perfect sense, and then the others come quoting debunked government propaganda that is only rightfully cited in papers on propaganda and statistics laundering, call anyone who disagrees with their misunderstanding of reality pedophiles and make complete asses of themselves to anyone with a brain. We really don't need to go through it anymore than once or twice before people can clearly see who makes sense and who has been completely brainwashed by government / media and/or thinks with their emotions instead of any rational reasoning.

So in a nutshell you want carte blanche to look at kids getting messed with without fear of getting nicked. Nice....

In a nutshell I think that it causes absolutely no ill effect if you look at pictures of anything. I once myself was not in favor of CP possession being decriminalized, but then I woke up one day and realized that all of the arguments for keeping it illegal are fucking retarded and based on lies concocted by people who have financial reasons to keep it illegal, and all of the arguments for it being legal to look at make perfect sense and are generally not coming out of the mouthes of people who seem to be borderline psychotic and/or fucking retarded. Seriously take a step back, you are in favor of making certain very large numbers illegal. From a strictly technical point of view it is just mind boggling absurd. What if you add +1 to the decimal representation of a CP picture? What if you split it up into a bunch of tiny numbers?? What if you encode it as a book with English words, should that book consisting of words that can then be translated to the picture be made iillegal? What if I change the word encoding program to use different words??? What if I use stego and hide CP in a movie? Or analyze a movie and see which pixels correlate to those in a CP image and then release a program that slices those pixels from the movie and reconstructs them into the CP image or a rough approximation of it? Do you want all digital content to be illegal?

From a practical perspective it doesn't make any sense either. The large majority of people who view CP are not child molesters, so their crime is entirely in looking at an image. What harm does that cause? I can not see this magic that so many seem convinced of, that looking at a series of colored pixels has an effect on the world outside of the electrical patterns in the brain of the viewer and components of the electronics used to transfer and display it. What is so wrong about that? it is no different than looking at a picture of a fucking lake or the holocaust. People who say otherwise are simply making shit up to justify their own opinions, it is as if I say "What you eat carrots?! That causes children to die! What the fuck is wrong with you you child murderer!" !! It is called a non-sequitur, it is a logical fallacy and it is more suited to propaganda than any rational argument.

Even in the fantasy world where looking at CP causes a rise in demand which in turn causes more children to be molested, there are steps that can be taken to entirely mask the demand for CP while still allowing it to be viewed. Ever heard of private information retrieval ? But of course nobody would even consider this, because their issue is not really with people viewing child porn leading to an increase in molestation, their issue is simply with people viewing child porn. They are demonized by the sensationalist media, they are made to be synonymous with child molesters despite the overwhelming evidence that the majority of them are not and they are hunted down by law enforcement and private industry which makes profits of billions of dollars a year in doing so. There are several dozen cases of falsified statistics which have been exposed from these groups.

It is really pointless to even mention these things, because the people who are against CP being legal to view are entirely emotional creatures or they have been brainwashed entirely by the media/government. Their views are empirically proven as wrong and it does not stop them from parroting the same debunked bullshit and peddling the same hogwash about magic processes or ignoring that even in the fantasy world they live in where they are correct about the facts, steps could be taken to completely ameliorate the risks they present, such as PIR to cryptographically mask demand.

I wish these people would at least stop acting like they are trying to save the children and instead admit that they are interested in

A. making profit
B. Attacking people who are harmless, but different from them in ways they can not tolerate

my only hope is that they are actually brainwashed and not entirely responsible for their complete lack of reason and blind entirely reasonless hatred.

2330
Off topic / is limetless a bot?
« on: August 16, 2012, 01:02 pm »
60 posts per day means a post every 24 minutes. Assuming he sleeps for the average of 8 hours a day that would mean he posts every 16 minutes every waking hour of the day. I am starting to think he may be artificial intelligence masquerading as a human.

2331
Security / Re: Should I be wary of this customer ?
« on: August 16, 2012, 12:56 pm »
There is nothing wrong with having a name consisting of random characters :<

2332
Off topic / Re: Would you guys like an expanded forum site?
« on: August 16, 2012, 12:52 pm »
I would not complain if it had a section for trip reports for the products of SR vendors, a section specifically for posting documents / news articles related to online drug scene or LE information,  and possibly a hacking/programming section , but other than that it seems fine to me. It should definitely not have a section for music, tv, career, school or sports, some because they are stupid to include on a drug forum and others because they are stupid and would lead to profiling. A section for deeper discussions would not bother me but I can entirely live with out it. Most of those things are already being discussed in off topic anyway.



2333
Where asylum gets tricky is that an embassy can grant it to someone, however getting that someone out of the embassy and the country is a whole different story.  The soil might be sovereign but the airspace out of it isn't.  There are many cases of people granted asylum who have had to live in the embassy for a long time until the diplomatic angles can be worked out between the two countries.

They could smuggle him out in a diplomatic bag

Tricky.

Diplomatic Bags are designated for "official materials" and I'm not sure Assange counts as such. They could put him in a diplomatic car which the Police have the power to stop, but not to search - of course he'd also presumably have to get out of the car at some point but I imagine he would be safe enough once he got outside the city itself provided the driver knows what he's doing...

The Ecuadorean government could also grant him temporary diplomatic status although this wouldn't necessarily grant him immunity from arrest.

The UK government are citing the Diplomatic and Consular Premises Act 1987 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/46) which effectively gives the British government carte blanche to revoke an Embassy's status.

Only a race of people as arrogant as we British could create a law to try and undermine the one inviolate rule!

More info : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18521881

V.

It doesn't particularly matter what diplomatic bags are designated for considering that they are protected from being searched or interfered with in anyway. Intelligence agencies have kidnapped people and smuggled them out of countries in diplomatic bags, it should be good enough for Assange.

2334
Security / Re: tor is working, but .onion adresses dont
« on: August 16, 2012, 10:59 am »
Your clock needs to be correct

2335
Also if you decide to come back to this TT/SR/Whatever ya wana call yaself please inform us how many cocks you have fit in you all in one go, if it's less than 10 then I'm afraid you lose.

is your record 10 ?

No as I don't swing that way. How about you?

I'm not the one who said she lost if she didn't get 10 or more cocks in her ;). Since you didn't specify otherwise, it seems to imply that you are the reigning champion.

2336
Off topic / Re: SR is the least of our Troubles
« on: August 16, 2012, 09:59 am »
And the idea of allowing pornographic drawings, writings etc involving children is abhorrent in a civilized society. We don't allow these things because we don't allow the people who do such things, to live amongst us. It isn't and shouldn't be tolerated in any form.

It may be abhorrent to you (and me, for that matter), but being offended by it isn't a reason to make it illegal.

Using your logic, all art/literature containing depictions of murder are illegal. We don't allow fictitious murder, because we don't allow the people who do such things to live amongst us. How about depictions of rape/torture/violent attacks? (I guess there's going to be a lot less murder-mystery novels and blockbusters coming out). How about assault/kidnapping/armed robbery/theft/drug use/drunk driving/jaywalking, where do you draw the line? Freedom of expression exists for a reason. Ultimately, it's not harming anyone, so there's no reason for any government involvement.

These people are firm believers in the Ostrich philosophy of burying their heads in the sand. I imagine that they must have some sort of a developmental delay considering humans are supposed to realize that not seeing things doesn't make them stop existing at a very young age. 

2337
Where asylum gets tricky is that an embassy can grant it to someone, however getting that someone out of the embassy and the country is a whole different story.  The soil might be sovereign but the airspace out of it isn't.  There are many cases of people granted asylum who have had to live in the embassy for a long time until the diplomatic angles can be worked out between the two countries.

They could smuggle him out in a diplomatic bag

2338
Also if you decide to come back to this TT/SR/Whatever ya wana call yaself please inform us how many cocks you have fit in you all in one go, if it's less than 10 then I'm afraid you lose.

is your record 10 ?

2339
Off topic / Re: SR is the least of our Troubles
« on: August 16, 2012, 08:14 am »
It is kind of pointless really, the people who argue that it should not be illegal to view CP present rational arguments, scientific studies and make perfect sense, and then the others come quoting debunked government propaganda that is only rightfully cited in papers on propaganda and statistics laundering, call anyone who disagrees with their misunderstanding of reality pedophiles and make complete asses of themselves to anyone with a brain. We really don't need to go through it anymore than once or twice before people can clearly see who makes sense and who has been completely brainwashed by government / media and/or thinks with their emotions instead of any rational reasoning.

2340
Security / Re: The Social Engineer: Displays utter Stupidity.
« on: August 15, 2012, 03:12 pm »
Tonight I think the social engineer has displayed utter stupidity, and proven to me that I won't be buying from vendor on the Road.  Tonight He / She has uploaded a report to pill reports on Australia's page, with links to his vendor page.  I think everyone will understand the stupidity of this.  The Social Engineer should think before He / She acts and puts both him / her self and the rest of the roads community at risk...   ???

if that puts SR at risk it must have really shitty security

Pages: 1 ... 154 155 [156] 157 158 ... 249