1981
Silk Road discussion / Re: What OS Do You Prefer to Access "The Road"
« on: October 03, 2012, 06:32 am »
what about BSD?!?!?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I realize that, but I want to make sure I'm doing it right with other people's public keys. Like I encrypted that message with Guru's public key and my private key - I can read it - but I want to know if Guru can still read it as well.
just use a vpn. buy with a prepaid credit card for a gas station. and if you're gonna do some really illegal shyt, make sure you use a public wifi.
I don't understand why so many people in this thread keep suggesting that a VPN is used. Your ISP is much more capable of seeing the websites you surf via a VPN than they are via Tor.
probably because you can use tor through a vpn, thus adding to the anonymity. crazy huh?
If an attacker watches your entry and exit traffic you are deanonymized regardless of the number of middle nodes, pretty crazy huh?
LOL what? your ISP gets to see encrypted traffic, the VPN gets to see encrypted traffic too. They can do tagging attacks (until there is some kind of authenticity in Tor) and they can do passive fingerprinting attacks and timing attacks (always possible in low latency networks). But you haven't compromised your security/anonymity one bit compared to Tor without VPN. Clown.
You don't need to use "my friend" here
just use a vpn. buy with a prepaid credit card for a gas station. and if you're gonna do some really illegal shyt, make sure you use a public wifi.
I don't understand why so many people in this thread keep suggesting that a VPN is used. Your ISP is much more capable of seeing the websites you surf via a VPN than they are via Tor.
probably because you can use tor through a vpn, thus adding to the anonymity. crazy huh?
Hi Pine, it's True, I am relatively new to site, and yes my post count is low. However, I do wish to use site safely and improve my way's as I go. I appreciate the concern, can you provide an alternative to PingIt/MTGox type methods for bitcoins?
in my first post i put 'only use if you have a relaxed attitude to your details being used', at least up to the point of stepping stone transfers via wallets. This PingIt method and the MTGox method is the only way I've found ideal for me to do the BTC purchasing and transferring.
If you have a better way, please let me know, as at the moment I find PingIt to be the best way for me. I used MTGox hassle free until they blocked uk deposits and with that I even had to verify my account too, it didn't seem an issue.
Ive taken a look at localbitcoin options and although they do appear more anonymous, I don't want to have to meet someone that's 30+ miles away.
I understand that BTC's can be a suspicious thing but once we have BTC's at, say, Blockchain ... doesn't the jumping through instawallets etc lose the trail?
Also, should we be using instawallets via the TOR browser, or does that not really matter.
if the PingIt method ive mentioned rings loud alarm bells for you, please lead us to a better, safer option.. It could help me and others.
Thanks for your time, I've seen many of your posts and I hold you in high regard on here
[EDIT] --- for DiscreteCat ... I PM'd you, I also got the P2001 error and I believe I know WHY you got yours.. (see PM)
A safer more secure option is to use OTC or over the counter exchange. This will mean instead of using central exchanges which are prone to being subpoenaed, closed down, targeted by hackers, or otherwise a bottleneck in obtaining BTC and not usually a cheap one at that, you are essentially acquiring bitcoins from other people directly in exchange for any payment service they are happy to be paid in.
This provides more payment flexibility. This provides far more anonymity. Since vendors have a easier way to cash out, this may even ultimately mean the transaction cost is lower than the hurdles you must go through today with exchanges if you wish to remain anonymous (e.g. if you use Tor with MtGox, you get red flagged, so it becomes a pain in the ass to be anonymous using it because you have to setup a proxy).
Examples of these OTC worldwide services:
http://bitcoin-otc.com Note: There are no fees charged period last time I checked. This may appear formidable at first, but do your homework you won't regret it, this will be time saver.
http://www.tradebitcoin.com
https://localbitcoins.com/
The next ones I'm listing are not OTC, but they are compelling because they allow cash deposits (anonymous entry to bitcoin because cash deposits don't require ID, and even if they do, which is super rare, they've nothing to make a comparison to if you have fake ID anyway). Cash deposits and CIM are the only way I would deal with exchanges.
I haven't mentioned them before because I haven't checked them out thoroughly so you'll have to do your own homework but they are:
http://bitcoinme.com/index.php/buy/
If you are in Australia this looks great, cash deposits at 4 different bank branches available:
https://www.spendbitcoins.com/buy/
And similarly this:
https://www.omnicoins.com/
For New Zealand:
http://coinmarket.co.nz/buy/
For USA, Aus, NZ:
https://www.mrbitcoins.com/
If you are getting stuck, you can use https://www.virwox.com/ with which you'll acquire Linden dollars and then sell it for Bitcoins. I'd be interested in hearing feedback from anybody who's tried this since it's not something I've done myself. Seems like a very practical way if cash deposits + CIM get outlawed and there are no OTC arrangements to back you up.
That means if the US government tried to ban bitcoin, they would have to ban every virtual currency in existence as well and/or make all vidya that use in-game currencies subject to AML regulations. Lulz. That is literally impossible. People will be like: I'm an orc, fuck you.
Some help for our UK comrades since cash deposits in UK have been drying up lately.
https://londonbitcoinexchange.wordpress.com/ (cash deposit)
http://www.BitcoinNordic.com (CIM)
Alternatively you can use Virwox (virtual currency) or https://www.wm-center.com/ ('real' virtual currency) where you will acquire a virtual currency and then exchange that for B$.
--
My opinion is that one should try the OTC methods first, because they are the best for your security and once you understand it it's easier than using the other methods (it's like learning PGP, a one time investment and then you're good to go forever).
The most important thing with OTC is scams. You need to pay very close attention to the various reputation systems, just as you do on SR, if there is escrow services possible (not currently) then you need to be using those for sure. So using OTC requires you to keep your wits about you.
If OTC doesn't work out for you, there are cash deposits or CIM. And if that doesn't work out there are virtual currency exchanges. There are always options.
In fact there is an entire universe of payment possibilities. LE are trying to close them down, starting with the exchanges, but they shall fail, they have never faced an enemy this amorphous before. The online market is tiny, tiny in comparison of the overall illegal product market, but the quantity of brainpower going into making dead ends for LE is overwhelmingly disproportionate. Make no mistake, LE are shitting themselves, they've never had geeks as enemies before now. Even if they pull their geek squads together, they have to pay them uber dolla, which is no good when you're faalsocing over 9000 geeks working for the lulz, free market principals and money. It's a question of scale. They can't scale up so they'll attempt draconian methods instead, which shall backfire horribly. Tying our acquisition of bitcoins to your identity is simply one option among thousands, think out of the box and use Google and you'll find something, always.
just use a vpn. buy with a prepaid credit card for a gas station. and if you're gonna do some really illegal shyt, make sure you use a public wifi.
You and kmfkewm assume that because I prevent you using that right, that I then take that right from you. This doesn't make sense to me because I am not availing of that right in any way.
Pine, you have changed the type of slavery to a slavery that is immoral and would be illegal.
We are not talking about generational bonded servitude, That would be wrong. We are talking about contractual servitude or indentured servitude.
You ask about a child born to the slave, the child is born free and not the property of anyone. S/He is endowed by there creator with rights of a free person and until they are an adult and can consent to the contract they can not be a slave. That is unless the contract was to produce a child, however that would be a surrogate mother or sperm donor contract. lol
I think we should probably veer the topic back to the book in case we get even more off tangent, but suffice to say I think my idea of slavery is not only the one defined in the dictionary, but that more importantly it is the one operated in practice. Temporary bonding such as indentured servants shouldn't be described as slavery. It is an extreme form of a salaried person, where the contract is longer than normal, but it is not slavery.
I agree that kmfkewm's idea of voluntary exchange being universal would imply a person could sell themselves in a free market. This is logically consistent. But I am saying that despite that consistency that it leads to dramatically worse logical contradiction, a dystopian world where the free market is completely corrupted because of the implications of that non reversible yet still voluntary action. That is why I am saying that the sale of oneself is and should be an illegal operation in a free market, even though this could be a voluntary exchange.
Slavery means the ownership of people. There are no caveats in theory or practice such as the ones kmfkewm and yourself describe. There are no institutional protections against evil pine. If you are not conceptualizing human beings as cattle, to be worked, slaughtered, bred and otherwise used, then they are not slaves and the word has been redefined into something more appealing to a 21st century perspective, but very much detached from how the institution of slavery operated in it's heyday. FWIW the UN's definition of slavery is overly broad, I think that confuses discussions like these.
But I'll say no more. I already made a long post to kmfkewm but I deleted it since I felt we were getting away from the core material. I think we understand each other's point of view, it is just that we disagree with it, it can't be reconciled by further debate.
Back later with more, different free market/state caveats!
Think it's blown out of proportion personally.
The purchase of Bitcoins is a legal act.