It is funny how every post of kmfkewm(and apparently some other people posting here too) can be summarized as "I want to do drugs so bad I'd kill anyone trying to stop me". Pretty good advertisement of all us doing drugs who aren't psychopaths.
"I want to be free so badly that anyone who wishes to enslave me should be killed" is a more accurate way of summarizing my beliefs. Your beliefs on the other hand are best summarized with the following quote: "I have been told that government is good for so long, and I am so afraid of living my own life, that I will let them enslave me rather than be free or make choices".
Anyway what are you internet anarchists still doing here? I saw today real anarchists - punks - who fuck the system, live their lives, are homeless, squatting in some abandoned places drinking booze and not giving a fuck. And none of them had laptop, smartphone or anything that looked like technology that would be able to connect to the internet(invented by the government for the government btw), so I bet you weren't one of them. How come?
Most anarchists I know are fairly well to do and fixated on cryptography and anonymity, both of which generally involve computers and the internet. So unsurprisingly you understanding of what makes an anarchist is incorrect. Also I bet that the homeless drunk squatting anarchists are not accomplishing nearly as much in regards to fucking the system as the internet anarchists are. I mean, when you look at just Wikileaks and Silk Road there are two internet based anarchist endeavors that have likely done far more for the cause of anarchy than your drunken homeless anarchist examples have. I also have a strong suspicion that your example anarchists are 'socialist anarchists' and not 'libertarian anarchists'.
Where is the revolution? Even Lenin said "scientists are doing research on 4th dimension and it's fine, but tzar can be abolished only in 3 dimensions" - so why are you arguing on the internet? Arguing nonetheless with the people who would actually support some of your ideas, but instead of making them your allies you make them your enemies. What's the point?
Well Wikileaks and Silkroad are both two examples of cryptoanarchy , they seem to have the state pretty upset (ie: leaking their classified documents, selling drugs while flipping off the DEA) and also the state seems pretty powerless to stop them. Oh yeah also Bitcoin in itself is a cryptoanarchist venture and the state probably doesn't appreciate that very much. So we are out there getting shit done , have no doubt about that.
The imbeciles, there are plenty of them. People of many words and few actions. Suffering for millions while sitting in comfy chairs drinking warm milk and surfing the internet.
I have done more than my fair share for the cause, undoubtedly more than you have.
Show Posts
. 