Quote from: Wadozo on September 03, 2012, 03:07 pmFirst off grahamgreene, I was not referring to you in any way whatsoever when I wrote there were two parties of oposing views. I was commenting on the constant back and forth verbal sprays from one side consisting of SocialBombshell and punkst0ner V's BlarghRawr and kryptoz.If you read what I wrote, I clearly state that I am not taking any sides to anything, especially since I am not aware of all the facts in the matter. QuoteI personally wouldn't feel comfortable backing either side, regardless if I thought there were a lot of inconsistencies and co-incidences, until I have had the opportunity to look at all the evidence and heard what Lim had to say when questions were posed to him about what happened. It's a very sensitive subject that shall unravel itself over the next few days.QuoteI was pointing out that there was some passionate views om the matter and as such, one of the two groups would have to back down and eat humble pie as they would be clearly proven wrong once the full story has been revealed. :-\Perhaps I should have stated that I personally am not taking any sides. I just wanted to clarify my position in relation to my earlier posts!I don't think there is going to be any 'full story' though; there is no story to tell in the first place. vlad1m1r scammed people because they were willing to FE on things such as investment schemes and Bitcoin exchanges. He likely got scammed by pirateat40 then decided to cut and run himself. Why Limetless is being dragged into it on the basis of very shaky coincidences - and it must be noted that this is happening in his absence - is completely beyond me. The story consists of the same beginning, middle and end as any other scam on Silk Road: people are willing to give their money to someone they don't know, and usually have no chance of finding, leaving the protection of the escrow system to do so.Limetless has no obligation to answer any questions as he has not done anything wrong. He can simply brush off his detractors and tell them he doesn't have to validate himself with anyone, which he doesn't.I understand the points you're making, but they're based on the premise of Limetless answering questions posed by those who are accusing him of being part of a scam, despite no evidence suggesting that that is the case.Personally, if it were me, I'd tell them where to go, stick them on my ignore list and carry on with business as usual.