Quote from: Wadozo on September 03, 2012, 12:17 pmThere is such a split in opinion here. Both sides are extremely passionate about their belief of what transpired and come the "show down" in a few days time, there will be a group of members who will have to eat a large slice of humble pie and walk away with their tail between their legs. I personally wouldn't feel comfortable backing either side, regardless if I thought there were a lot of inconsistencies and co-incidences, until I have had the opportunity to look at all the evidence and heard what Lim had to say when questions were posed to him about what happened. It's a very sensitive subject that shall unravel itself over the next few days.I am not taking sides at all. I am simply arguing the point that one cannot categorically state that somebody is guilty of something when one has no evidence to back up one's accusations. People here are using an occasional coincidence, vague conversational comments between vlad1m1r and Limetless which they interpret to mean something that furthers their own agenda and the rapport that vlad1m1r and Limetless had built up as some sort of conclusive proof that they're both in this together to scam everyone or that Limetless and vlad1m1r were both LE. Whilst I cannot discount the possibility of that, just as I cannot discount the possibility that everybody else in the world is a brain eating alien that feeds whilst I am asleep, both scenarios aren't very plausible. Not impossible, of course, but implausible. There's NOTHING to suggest that Limetless is guilty of anything leveled at him in this thread. Innocent until proven guilty. How so many can deny someone THAT right on an underground drug forum is beyond me when it's the first thing anyone here would cry when apprehended by the law.I am not 'backing Limetless up' here - I am defending an innocent person who is not currently in a position to defend themselves. He is also under no obligation to answer any questions posed to him about what happened as there is no evidence that he has done anything wrong.As I stated before, I am no fan of Limetless. I find his comments and general demeanour quite immature. However, I will defend him here until there is actual conclusive proof that he has done something wrong, just as I would defend any of you if you were in the same boat.There will be no 'humble pie' or 'tail between the legs' here, no matter which way this turns out. I'll stand tall knowing that I did what was right and what was just.I defend a man who is currently incapable of defending himself, who is innocent until proven guilty, and for that I will make no apologies.- grahamgreene